等中心扫描降低多层螺旋CT冠状动脉血管成像辐射剂量的随机对照研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.02.011

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1339 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨等中心扫描对降低冠状动脉多层螺旋CT血管成像(MSCTA)辐射剂量的价值。方法采用前瞻性随机对照研究方法。纳入广东省中医院珠海医院2016年11月—2018年4月144例行冠状动脉MSCTA检查患者,将患者按随机区组法分为A、B、C、D 4组,每组36例。A组采用常规扫描定位,电流为智能毫安;B、C、D组采用等中心位置扫描,电流分别为智能毫安、智能毫安的90%、智能毫安的80%。4组扫描管电压均为120 kV。比较4组患者冠状动脉MSCTA图像的客观图像质量噪声、信噪比(SNR),主观质量评分比及辐射剂量(ED),对直径＞1.5 mm的血管节段采用冠状动脉15分段法评分,用以评价主观图像质量。客观噪声方面,4组重建图像中的主支气管选择,感兴趣区(面积约15.0 mm²),测量其标准差值作为噪声值,SNR为其CT值/标准差。结果 MSCTA图像分析显示,以D、A、C、B组为序,噪声依次降低(分别为15.09±2.97、2.68±2.47、2.57±2.29和2.45±4.36),SNR依次升高(分别为63.74±19.78、78.64±14.66、78.66±14.84和79.66±22.90);D组与A、B、C组两两比较,噪声高而SNR低,差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.05);A、B、C组间噪声及SNR两两比较,差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05)。4组冠状动脉图像质量主观评分优良率98.9%(1 939/1 960),4组间比较差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05);A、B、C、D辐射剂量依次降低,分别为(3.39±1.39)mSv、(2.89±1.21)mSv、(2.56±1.05)mSv,(2.14±0.87)mSv,其中A组明显高于C、D组,B组高于D组,差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.05)。结论在不降低冠状动脉成像质量的情况下,等中心扫描能降低冠状动脉MSCTA的辐射剂量。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	肖梦强
	沈君
	刘金丰
	张萌
	雷鸣
	周桂忠
	王忠德

关键词 ：体层摄影术,螺旋计算机, 冠状动脉, 等中心扫描, 辐射剂量

Abstract：Objective To investigate the value of isocenter scanning in reducing radiation dose in coronary artery multi-slice spiral CT angiography (MSCTA).Methods This is a prospective randomized controlled trial. A total of 144 patients with coronary artery MSCTA were collected in Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhuhai Hospital from November 2016 to April 2018. They were randomly divided into groups A, B, C, and D, with 36 patients in each group. Group A was in conventional body position, and the current was intelligent milliampere; Groups B, C, D were in the isocenter body position, and the current was intelligent milliampere, 90% of intelligent milliampere, 80% of intelligent milliampere, respectively. The tube voltage of each group was 120 kV. The image quality noise, sigal noise ratio (SNR), subjective evaluation of image quality and radiation dose (ED) of images were compared among the four groups. The subjective image quality (the vascular diameter＞1.5 mm) were evaluated by 15 sections method.The four sets of reconstructed images chosen from gas of primary bronchi which covers an area of about 15.0 mm² was measured as noise value and SNR was its CT/standard deviation.Results Among the four groups, there was a statistically significant difference in the noise and SNR between group D with group A,B,C(all P values＜0.05). There was no significant difference in noise and signal-to-noise ratio between groups A, B and C(all P values＞0.05). The noise gradually decreased while the SNR gradually increased in the order of group D, A, C,and B(15.09±2.97, 2.68±2.47, 2.57±2.29, 2.45±4.36 and 63.74±19.78, 78.64±14.66, 78.66±14.84, 79.66±22.90). There was no statistically significant difference in the subjective scores of coronary arteries among the four groups(all P values＞0.05). The subjective scores of coronary artery image quality were excellent in all 4 groups, and the good total rate was 98.9%(1 939/1 960). Radiation doses of A, B, C, and D group were (3.39±1.39) mSv, (2.89±1.21) mSv, (2.56±1.05) mSv, and (2.14±0.87) mSv, respectively.The radiation dose of group A was signficantly higher than group C and D(all P values＜0.05).Conclusions An isocenter scan can reduce the radiation dose of coronary MSCTA without reducing the quality of coronary imaging.

Key words： Tomography, Spiral Computer Coronary artery Isocenter scan Radiation dose

收稿日期: 2018-04-17

通讯作者: 刘金丰,Email: jfliuzhuhai@163.com

引用本文:

肖梦强,沈君,刘金丰,张萌,雷鸣,周桂忠,王忠德. 等中心扫描降低多层螺旋CT冠状动脉血管成像辐射剂量的随机对照研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(2): 145-150.
Xiao Mengqiang, Shen Jun, Liu Jingfeng, Zhang Meng, Lei Ming, Zhou Guizhong, Wang Zhongde. A randomized controlled study on isocenter scanning in reducing the radiation dose of multi-slice spiral CT coronary angiography. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2019, 24(2): 145-150.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.02.011 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V24/I2/145

[1]	叶国伟, 邹建勋, 陈旭高, 等. 320层CT前瞻性门控窄窗和靶向扫描方式在低心率冠状动脉成像中的辐射剂量[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2015, 21 (2): 114-117. DOI:10.19627/j.cnki.cn31-1700/th.2015.02.007.
[2]	田序伟, 马爱琳, 周仁冰, 等. 南疆地区维吾尔族与汉族健康体检人群多层螺旋CT血管成像壁冠状动脉及其粥样硬化的比较[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2018, 23(4): 277-281. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2018.04.001.
[3]	李莉明, 刘杰, 高剑波. 冠状动脉CT成像的个体化低对比剂剂量优化研究[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2016, 35(12): 1899-1903. DOI:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2016.12.034.
[4]	杨利莉, 汪芳, 赵艳红, 等. 基于iDose4迭代重建的回顾性心电门控冠状动脉CT血管成像低剂量技术的初步研究[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2014, 30(1): 128-132. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2014.01.030.
[5]	何其舟, 余飞, 付亚军, 等. 体质指数、窄R-R间期结合前瞻性心电门控和迭代重建技术在CTCA三低成像中的应用[J]. 放射学实践, 2017, 32(9): 936-941. DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2017.09.009.
[6]	黄瑞良, 郝菲, 马靖. 能谱CT的SSA技术在前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉成像中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(5): 764-767. DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201609066.
[7]	高思喆, 马跃, 侯阳, 等. 全模型迭代重建算法(IMR)在“双低”冠状动脉CTA成像中应用价值的探讨[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2018, 29(3): 177-181. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1062.2018.03.007.
[8]	Maffei E, Martini C, De Crescenzo S, et al. Low dose CT of the heart: A quantum leap into a new era of cardiovascular imaging[J]. Radiol Med, 2010, 115(8): 1179-1207. DOI:10.1007/s11547-010-0566-4.
[9]	赵婷婷, 刘文骏, 张蕴. 宽容度在前瞻性心电门控冠状动脉CTA中的应用价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(2): 322-326. DOI:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.02.034.
[10]	肖梦强, 张萌, 刘金丰, 等. 迭代算法低剂量CT诊断腰椎间盘突出[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(3): 458-461. DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201608053.
[11]	张微晗. 体质量指数结合迭代重建算法在螺旋 CT冠状动脉成像中的应用[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2015, 20(4): 325-329. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2015.04.010.
[12]	汪芳, 郝万庆, 杨利莉, 等. 256排宽体探测器CT智能心电门控技术在不控制心率患者冠状动脉CTA中的应用[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2017, 33(7): 1080-1084. DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.201611037.
[13]	邢桂荣, 包丽丽, 刘挨师. 320排 CT 前瞻性心电门控容积扫描窄采集窗设置的临床评价[J]. CT理论与应用研究, 2016, 25(4): 445-452. DOI:10.15953/j.1004-4140.2016.25.04.08.
[14]	Maeda E, Yamamoto K, Kanno S, et al. Diagnostic phase of calcium scoring scan applied as the center of acquisition window of coronary computed tomography angiography improves image quality in minimal acquisition window scan (target CTA mode) using the second generation 320-row CT[J]. Scientific World Journal, 2016, 2016: 1017851. DOI:10.1155/2016/1017851.
[15]	梁心红, 余林, 孙戈, 等. 320排容积CT低管电压结合低浓度对比剂冠状动脉成像与冠状动脉造影的对比研究[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(3): 458-462. DOI:10.13929/j.1003-3289.2015.03.039.
[16]	Sun G, Li M, Jiang XS, et al. 320-detector row CT coronary angiography: Effects of heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality, diagnostic accuracy and radiation exposure[J]. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(1016): e388-e394. DOI:10.1259/bjr/92160185.
[17]	Khosa F, Khan A, Nasir K, et al. Influence of image acquisition on radiation dose and image quality: Full versus narrow phase window acquisition using 320 MDCT[J]. Scientific World Journal, 2013, 2013: 731590. DOI:10.1155/2013/731590.
[18]	闫士举, 王蕴衡, 仇庆. 非等中心锥束CT成像系统标定及三维重建[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2014, 30(11): 1739-1744. DOI: 10.13929/j.1003-3289.2014.11.042.
[19]	严诚, 陈刚, 丁玉芹, 等. 评价迭代重建法与滤过反投影法在冠状动脉CTA检查中的价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2014, 29(6): 663-667. DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2014.06.021.
[20]	黄乐生, 刘金丰, 刘海龙, 等. 不同心率对于640层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像质量及相关辐射剂量的影响[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2016, 14(1): 52-55. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-5131.2016.01.017.