运动诱发电位和BBB评分在大鼠脊髓损伤功能评价中的相关性研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.03.019

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1143 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨大鼠脊髓损伤功能评价指标运动诱发电位(MEP)和Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB)评分的相关性。方法成年雌性SD大鼠16只,采用数字表法随机分为对照组和实验组,每组8只。对照组只施行手术,不给予外力打击。实验组应用PSI-IH装置复制脊髓损伤模型。记录并分析损伤前以及损伤后3 h、1 d、3 d、1周、2周、3周、4周、5周、6周大鼠脊髓运动诱发电位(scMEP)和肌肉运动诱发电位(mMEP),同时采用BBB评分对大鼠后肢运动功能进行评定。6周后观察大鼠脊髓组织学结构变化。结果实验组大鼠脊髓损伤后3 h scMEP波幅减小,为正常波幅的32.69%±0.83%,2周后为正常波幅的52.93%±2.23%并处于稳定状态,但均低于对照组(P值均＜0.01);损伤后3 h mMEP波形消失,1 d后恢复至正常波幅的1.16%±0.17%,3 d后波幅明显恢复,4周后达正常波幅的48.20%± 3.70%并处于稳定状态,但均低于对照组(P值均＜0.01)。实验组大鼠脊髓损伤后3 h和1 d,所有大鼠BBB评分均为0分,3 d后评分(1.38±0.52)分,4周后评分(11.50±0.93)分,达到稳定状态,但均低于对照组(P值均＜0.01)。实验组大鼠脊髓损伤后3 h~6周,scMEP与BBB评分均为显著相关(r值为0.732~0.908,P值均＜0.05)。实验组大鼠脊髓损伤后1~6周mMEP与BBB评分呈中度至高度相关(r值为0.718～0.951,P值均＜0.05)。对照组大鼠以上各指标均无显著变化。结论大鼠脊髓损伤发生后,scMEP、mMEP和BBB评分三个脊髓功能指标会先后顺序恢复,而且scMEP、mMEP与BBB评分均存在着一定的相关性。大鼠脊髓损伤后,scMEP、mMEP是较BBB评分更为灵敏的脊髓功能评价指标。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	马善峰
	马奎
	吕合作

关键词 ：脊髓损伤, 诱发电位,运动, 行为学检测, Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan评分, 模型,动物, 大鼠

Abstract：Objective To investigate the correlation between motor evoked potential (MEP) and Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan (BBB) scores in evaluating spinal cord injury function in rats.Methods Sixteen adult female SD rats were randomly divided into control group and experimental group with 8 rats in each group. The animals of control group were only operated without external force, and the animals of experimental group were made the spinal cord injury (SCI) model used PSI-IH device. The spinal cord motor evoked potential (scMEP) and muscle motor evoked potential (mMEP) were recorded and analyzed before injury and 3 h, 1 d, 3 d, and the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th weeks after injury. The motor function of hind limbs was evaluated by BBB score. The histological changes of spinal cord were observed 6 weeks after SCI.Results After SCI, the amplitude of scMEP in the experimental group decreased to 32.69%±0.83% of the normal amplitude at 3 hours, and it reached 52.93%±2.23% of the normal amplitude at 2 weeks later, which was stable, but was lower than that of control group (all P values＜0.01); the mMEP waveform disappeared at 3 hours after SCI, and it reached to 1.16%±0.17% of the normal amplitude after one day of injury. 4th week after SCI, the amplitude of mMEP was 48.20%±3.70% of normal amplitude and was stable, but it was lower than that of the control group (all P values＜0.01). The BBB score in the experimental group were 0 at 3 hours and 1 day after SCI. The BBB scores were 1.38±0.52 after 3 days and which were 11.50±0.93 after 4 weeks, reaching a stable state, but they were lower than those of the control group (all P values＜0.01). In the experimental group, there was a significant correlation between scMEP and BBB score (r 0.732-0.908, all P values＜0.05) from 3 h to 6th week after SCI. There was a moderate or high correlation between mMEP and BBB score in the experimental group from 1st to 6th week after SCI (r 0.718-0.951, all P values＜0.05). There were no significant changes in the above indexes of the control group.Conclusions After SCI in rats, scMEP, mMEP and BBB scores will be recovered sequentially, and are correlated to some extent. In addition, scMEP and mMEP are more sensitive indicators of SCI than BBB scores.

Key words： Spinal cord injuries Evoked potentials, motor Behavior detection Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan scores Models, animal rats

收稿日期: 2019-03-27

基金资助:国家自然科学基金资助项目 (81571194、81071268)

通讯作者: 马善峰,Email:msfbio@163.com

引用本文:

马善峰, 马奎, 吕合作. 运动诱发电位和BBB评分在大鼠脊髓损伤功能评价中的相关性研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(3): 299-304.
Ma Shanfeng, Ma Kui, Lyu Hezuo. The correlation between motor evoked potential and BBB score of spinal cord injury in rats. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2019, 24(3): 299-304.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.03.019 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V24/I3/299

[1]	Ahmed RU, Alam M, Zheng YP. Experimental spinal cord injury and behavioral tests in laboratory rats[J]. Heliyon, 2019, 5(3): e01324. DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01324.
[2]	Campos Mello Inglez de Souza MC, Ferreira RJR, Patricio GCF, et al. Neurophysiological assessment of spinal cord injuries in dogs using somatosensory and motor evoked potentials[J]. Acta Vet Scand, 2017, 59(1): 37. DOI:10.1186/s13028-017-0305-0.
[3]	Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC. A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats[J]. J Neurotrauma, 1995, 12(1): 1-21. DOI:10.1089/neu.1995.12.1.
[4]	陈月娟, 石玲玲, 谢秀梅, 等. 大鼠PSI-IH脊髓撞击损伤模型的制备[J]. 华中科技大学学报(医学版), 2016, 45(4): 420-423. DOI:10.3870/j.issn.1672-0741.2016.04.014.
[5]	余科炜, 李家顺, 贾连顺,等. 大鼠分级脊髓损伤对经颅电刺激运动诱发电位的影响[J].中华外科杂志,1998, 36(7): 417-420. DOI:10.3760/j:issn:0529-5815.1998.07.012.
[6]	Basso DM, Beattie MS, Bresnahan JC, et al. MASCIS evaluation of open field locomotor scores: effects of experience and teamwork on reliability. Multicenter Animal Spinal Cord Injury Study[J]. J Neurotrauma, 1996, 13(7): 343-359. DOI:10.1089/neu.1996.13.343.
[7]	张淑娟, 李晓光. 电生理学检查方法在动物脊髓损伤模型中的应用[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2004, 10(11): 685-687. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2004.11.018.
[8]	陶涛涛, 屠文展, 蒋松鹤. 诱发电位在脊髓损伤患者及动物模型中的应用[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2011, 26(3): 288-291. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2011.03.025.
[9]	Marques MR, Nicola FC, Sanches EF, et al. Locomotor training promotes time-dependent functional recovery after experimental spinal cord contusion[J]. Neuroscience, 2018, 392: 258-269. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.08.033.
[10]	Sonmez E, Kabatas S, Ozen O, et al. Minocycline treatment inhibits lipid peroxidation, preserves spinal cord ultrastructure, and improves functional outcome after traumatic spinal cord injury in the rat[J]. Spine(Phila Pa 1976), 2013, 38(15): 1253-1259. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182895587.
[11]	Chen S, Yi M, Zhou G, et al. Abdominal aortic transplantation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells regulates the expression of ciliary neurotrophic factor and inflammatory cytokines in a rat model of spinal cord ischemia-reperfusion injury[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25: 1960-1969. DOI:10.12659/MSM.912697.
[12]	Sharma HS. Early microvascular reactions and blood-spinal cord barrier disruption are instrumental in pathophysiology of spinal cord injury and repair: Novel therapeutic strategies including nanowired drug delivery to enhance neuroprotection[J]. J Neural Transm (Vienna), 2011, 118(1): 155-176. DOI:10.1007/s00702-010-0514-4.
[13]	Jia ZQ, Li SQ, Qiao WQ, et al. Ebselen protects mitochondrial function and oxidative stress while inhibiting the mitochondrial apoptosis pathway after acute spinal cord injury[J]. Neurosci Lett, 2018, 678: 110-117. DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2018.05.007.
[14]	Zhang G, Zha J, Liu J, et al. Minocycline impedes mitochondrial-dependent cell death and stabilizes expression of hypoxia inducible factor-1α in spinal cord injury[J]. Arch Med Sci, 2019, 15(2): 475-483. DOI:10.5114/aoms.2018.73520.
[15]	Martin KK, Parvin S, Garraway SM. Peripheral inflammation accelerates the onset of mechanical hypersensitivity after spinal cord injury and engages tumor necrosis factor α signaling mechanisms[J]. J Neurotrauma, 2019. DOI:10.1089/neu.2018.5953.
[16]	Gao L, Zhang Z, Xu W, et al. Natrium benzoate alleviates neuronal apoptosis via the DJ-1-related anti-oxidative stress pathway involving akt phosphorylation in a rat model of traumatic spinal cord injury[J]. Front Mol Neurosci, 2019, 12: 42. DOI:10.3389/fnmol.2019.00042.
[17]	Tian Z, Yu W, Liu HB, et al. Neuroprotective effects of curculigoside against NMDA-induced neuronal excitoxicity in vitro[J]. Food Chem Toxicol, 2012, 50(11): 4010-4015. DOI:10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.006.
[18]	Zhao H, Chen S, Gao K, et al. Resveratrol protects against spinal cord injury by activating autophagy and inhibiting apoptosis mediated by the SIRT1/AMPK signaling pathway[J]. Neuroscience, 2017, 348: 241-251. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2017.02.027.
[19]	Molina AE, Cristante AF, de Barros TE Sr, et al. A computerized system for the application of Basso, Beattie and Bresnahan scale in Wistar rats[J]. Acta Ortop Bras, 2015, 23(4): 179-183. DOI:10.1590/1413-78522015230400673.
[20]	Song RB, Basso DM, da Costa RC, et al. Adaptation of the Basso-Beattie-Bresnahan locomotor rating scale for use in a clinical model of spinal cord injury in dogs[J]. J Neurosci Methods, 2016, 268: 117-124. DOI:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2016.04.023.
[21]	Dray C, Rougon G, Debarbieux F. Quantitative analysis by in vivo imaging of the dynamics of vascular and axonal networks in injured mouse spinal cord[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009, 106(23): 9459-9464. DOI:10.1073/pnas.0900222106.