输精管盆腔段及其周围结构的多层螺旋CT多期图像融合显示及影响因素分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.04.011

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1103 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨多层螺旋CT(MSCT)多期图像融合显示输精管盆腔段及其周围结构的可行性,并对输精管盆腔段显示的影响因素进行分析。方法前瞻性研究。以连续入组方式纳入2018年1月—2018年4月中山大学附属第一医院有多期MSCT盆腔扫描资料、年龄20~50岁的男性住院患者174例。对患者盆腔MSCT平扫期、静脉期及排泄期图像分别行容积重组,获得输精管盆腔段、髂血管、输尿管及膀胱图像,再进行图像融合。对融合图像进行评定:以双侧输精管盆腔段、输尿管及髂血管清晰显示,且无邻近器官干扰为合格图像,其余为不合格图像。归纳影响图像显示的因素,并进行统计学分析。结果获得合格图像72例(41.4%),不合格图像102例(58.6%)。影响图像显示的因素有:患者体质量指数(BMI)、盆腔小肠积聚、邻近器官(膀胱和/或直肠)过度充盈、年龄。合格图像患者的BMI为17.19~31.49(24.49±2.93)kg/m²,不合格图像为14.17~27.95(20.59±3.02)kg/m²,差异有统计学意义(t=8.493, P＜0.01);BMI≥22.55 kg/m² 为获得合格图像的界值,敏感度77.8%,特异度73.6%,受试者操作特征曲线下面积0.821。盆腔小肠积聚(72例)直接影响输精管盆腔段的显示,无法获得合格图像。无盆腔小肠积聚的102例患者中,无邻近器官过度充盈者与有邻近器官过度充盈者获得合格图像分别为84.6%(44/52)和56.0%(28/50),差异有统计学意义(χ²=10.054, P＜0.01)。按年龄段统计,合格图像比例随年龄增大而提高:20~30岁26.7%(8/30), 31~40岁39.6%(19/48),41~50岁46.9%(45/96),但不同年龄段的合格图像比例差异无统计学意义(χ²=3.936, P＞0.05)。结论 MSCT多期图像融合可以直观、立体地显示输精管及其周围结构,尤其适用于BMI≥22.55 kg/m²的人群,在充分做好检查前准备的基础上,可获得合格的图像。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王毓
	王焕军
	彭洋
	付文皓
	关键

关键词 ：输精管, 体层摄影术,X线计算机, 容积重组, 图像融合

Abstract：Objective To explore the feasibility of multiple-phase CT (MSCT)volume-rendered reconstruction and image fusion for displaying pelvic vas deferens and its adjacent structure, and analyze the influencing factors of displaying pelvic vas deferens.Methods The prospective study was conducted. A total of 174 male patients aged from 20 to 50 years old underwent multiple-phase abdominopelvic CT scan from January 2018 to April 2018 in the Affiliated Zhongshan Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine were prospectively included. Volume-rendered reconstruction and image fusion were made in all patients: pelvic section of vas deferens based on nonenhanced phase, iliac artery and iliac vein based on venous phase, ureter and bladder on delayed phase. The fusion images were evaluated: bilateral pelvic vas deferens, ureter, iliac vessels were clearly displayed, and no adjacent organs interference were considered as qualified images. The rest were unqualified images. then factors influencing image display were analyzed, and statistical analysis was performed.Results Fusion images from 72/182 (41.4%) patients were considered as qualified, on which bilateral vas deferens were clearly displayed and clinical analysis could be made. Fusion images from the remaining 102 (58.6%) were excluded. Factors affecting image displaying included body mass index (BMI), accumulation of small bowel in pelvic, overfilling of adjacent organs (bladder and/or rectum) as well as patients' age. The BMI range of the qualified images was 17.19-31.49(24.49±2.93)kg/m², and the BMI range of the unqualified images was 14.17-27.95(20.59±3.02)kg/m², and the difference was statistically significant (t=8.493, P＜0.01). BMI≥22.55 kg/m² was considered as the cut-off value for qualified images, with a sensitivity and specificity of 77.8%, and 73.6%, respectively(ROC curve 0.821, P＜0.01). Images showing small bowel accumulation were considered disqualified. Patients without bladder and/or rectum overfilling had a higher percentage of qualified images [84.6%(44/52)vs 56.0%(28/50)] and the statistical difference was significant (χ²=10.054, P＜0.01). Patients were divided into 3 groups according to age, although the proportion of qualified images increased with aging:26.7% (8/30) of 20-30 years old, 39.6% (19/48) of 31-40 years old and 46.9% (45/96) of 41-50 years old, no statistical significance was found(χ²=3.936, P＞0.05).Conclusions The influencing factors of image displaying include BMI, accumulation of small bowel in pelvic, overfilling of adjacent organs as well as patients' age. For patients with BMI of 22.55 kg/m² or above, qualified images displaying pelvic vas deferens and adjacent structure by MSCT volume-rendered reconstruction and image fusion can be made through a proper preparation such as intestinal preparation and moderate bladder filling before CT scan.

Key words： Vas deferens Tomography, X-ray computed Volume-rendered Image fusion

收稿日期: 2018-11-12

通讯作者: 关键,Email: Usefulkey0077@163.com

引用本文:

王毓, 王焕军, 彭洋, 付文皓, 关键. 输精管盆腔段及其周围结构的多层螺旋CT多期图像融合显示及影响因素分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(4): 370-374.
Wang Yu, Wang Huanjun, Peng Yang, Fu Wenhao, Guan Jian. Analysis of pelvic vas deferens and its adjacent structure display and influencing factors on multiple-phase CT fusion imaging. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2019, 24(4): 370-374.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.04.011 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2019/V24/I4/370

[1]	Frey KA. Male reproductive health and infertility[J]. Prim Care, 2010, 37(3): 643-652. DOI:10.1016/j.pop.2010.04.005.
[2]	Esteves SC, Miyaoka R, Agarwal A. An update on the clinical assessment of the infertile male[J]. Clinics (Sao Paulo) , 2011, 66(4): 691-700. DOI:10.1590/s1807-59322011000400026.
[3]	Ammar T, Sidhu PS, Wilkins CJ. Male infertility: the role of imaging in diagnosis and management[J]. Br J Radiol, 2012, 85(Spec lss 1): S59-S68. DOI:10.1259/bjr/31818161.
[4]	柯尊金, 顾秋忠, 俞浩, 等. 精道造影在无精子症诊断中的临床应用57例分析[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2009, 23(7): 58-59,61. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2009.07.017.
[5]	Zhao LY, Tu XA, Xiang Y, et al. Was fine-needle vasography an obsolete diagnostic method to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction? Report of 37 cases[J]. Urol Int, 2010, 85(2): 186-193. DOI:10.1159/000315055.
[6]	赵良运, 项勇, 涂响安, 等. 输精管造影在射精管梗阻病因诊断中的作用探讨(附45例报告)[J]. 中国男科学杂志, 2009, 23(6): 28-33. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-0848.2009.06.007.
[7]	薄立伟, 曹恒海, 叶天河, 等. 输精管造影术对无精子症诊断价值及治疗作用的临床探讨[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2009, 17(1): 33-36. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-8189.2009.01.011.
[8]	Purohit RS, Wu DS, Shinohara K, et al. A prospective comparison of 3 diagnostic methods to evaluate ejaculatory duct obstruction[J]. J Urol, 2004, 171(1): 232-236. DOI:10.1097/01.ju.0000101909.70651.d1.
[9]	Onur MR, Orhan I, Firdolas F, et al. Clinical and radiological evaluation of ejaculatory duct obstruction[J]. Arch Androl, 2007, 53(4): 179-186. DOI:10.1080/01485010701426448.
[10]	龚红萍, 罗喆, 倪雪松, 等. 经体表及经直肠超声联合探查在精路梗阻致男性不育症诊断中的应用[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2009, 11(1): 54-55. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2009.01.018.
[11]	柏通, 孔令堃, 陈闯, 等. 高频超声及腔内超声对正常输精管的检测[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2017, 33(9): 823-825. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2017.09.020.
[12]	Chiang HS, Lin YH, Wu YN, et al. Advantages of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the seminal vesicles and intra-abdominal vas deferens in patients with congenital absence of the vas deferens[J]. Urology, 2013, 82(2): 345-351. DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.038.
[13]	Kim B, Kawashima A, Ryu JA, et al. Imaging of the seminal vesicle and vas deferens[J]. Radiographics, 2009, 29(4): 1105-1121. DOI:10.1148/rg.294085235.
[14]	张文智, 杨高怡, 王大力, 等. 输精管结核的超声表现分析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(8): 737-739. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2014.08.022.
[15]	贺新朱, 叶浩祥, 刘伟平, 等. CT平扫MPR和CPR重建技术对输精管结石的诊断价值[J]. 临床放射学杂志, 2018, 37(5): 804-806. DOI:10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2018.05.022.
[16]	陈春明,国际生命科学学会中国办事处中国肥胖问题工作组联合数据汇总分析协作组.中国成人体质指数分类的推荐意见简介[J].中华预防医学杂志,2001,35(5):349-350.DOI:10.3760/j:issn:0253-9624.2001.05.019.
[17]	刘爱东, 张兵, 王惠君, 等. 1997～2009年中国九省区成人体质指数分布及变化趋势研究[J]. 中国健康教育, 2011, 27(3): 167-170. DOI:10.16168/j.cnki.issn.1002-9982.2011.03.007.
[18]	Albert JM. Radiation risk from CT: implications for cancer screening[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol., 2013, 201(1): W81-W87. DOI:10.2214/ajr.12.9226.
[19]	Fuster-Parra P, Bennasar-Veny M, Tauler P, et al. A comparison between multiple regression models and CUN-BAE equation to predict body fat in adults[J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(3): e0122291. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0122291.