前路减压联合后路内镜手术在 “钳夹式”颈椎病治疗中的应用

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20190702-00209

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (14)

全文: PDF (1674 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨颈椎前路减压植骨融合内固定(ACDF)联合后路内镜手术治疗“钳夹式”颈椎病的疗效。方法回顾性分析。纳入2015年3月—2017年5月河北医科大学第三医院脊柱外科影像学及随访资料完整的28例“钳夹式”颈椎病患者,其中男15例、女13例,年龄33~71(52.214±8.234)岁。接受ACDF的15例患者纳入ACDF组。接受ACDF联合后路内镜手术的13例患者纳入联合手术组。对两组患者术后1年时的颈项部疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)及日本骨科协会(JOA)评分、颈椎曲度(Cobb角)、黄韧带面积、椎管矢状径、椎管面积、脊髓面积、椎间隙高度、轴性症状等临床及影像学指标进行比较。结果两组患者性别、年龄、病程、术前临床表现(颈椎功能障碍指数)、手术节段等基线资料比较,差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05)。两组患者术后各时间点VAS和JOA评分与术前相比,差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.01)。联合手术组与ACDF组术后1年Cobb角(10.85°±2.79°、9.33°±3.48°)比较差异无统计学意义(t=-1.255, P＞0.05)。两组患者术后1年时黄韧带面积、椎管矢状径、椎管面积及脊髓面积组间比较差异均有统计学意义(t=9.403、-2.855、-8.007、-2.447, P值均＜0.05),且组内手术前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.01)。术后1年椎间隙高度两组间比较差异无统计学意义(t=-0.534, P＞0.05),但组内手术前后比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.01)。随访满1年时,两组患者术后轴性症状发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.705)。结论联合手术较传统颈椎前路手术,减压更加彻底,更加有利于脊髓功能的恢复,并有效避免了传统后路手术对颈后部软组织的损伤。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	李泽阳
	李佳奇
	张飞
	孙亚彭
	郭磊
	张为
	王宪正
	崔浩
	高原

关键词 ：颈椎病, 颈前路减压融合手术, 颈椎后路内镜手术

Abstract：Objective To investigate the efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF)combined with posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy (PPECD) for the treatment of “pinching” cervical spondylotic myelopathy.Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted for 28 patients with “pinching” cervical spondylotic myelopathy who were admitted to the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University from March 2015 to May 2017 with the complete spinal surgery imaging and follow-up data were included. There were 15 males and 13 females. The age was 33-71 (52.214±8.234) years old. Fifteen patients who received anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery were enrolled in the ACDF group. And 13 patients who received anterior cervical decompression and fusion combined with posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy were enrolled in the combined surgery group. After 1 year of follow-up, the cervical visual analogue score(VAS) , the Japan Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the cervical curvature (Cobb angle), ligamentum flavum area, spinal canal sagittal diameter, spinal canal area, spinal cord area, inter-vertebral height and axial symptoms were compared between the two groups.Results There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline data such as gender, age, duration of disease, preoperative clinical manifestations (neck disability index score) and operative segment between the two groups (all P values>0.05). During the one year follow-up period, the JOA score and the VAS score of the two groups were significantly improved (all P values<0.01). Compared with the combined surgery group, there was no significant difference in the Cobb angle of the ACDF group after surgery(10.85 °± 2.79°, 9.33°± 3.48°) (t=-1.255, P>0.05). The differences in the ligamentum flavum area, spinal canal sagittal diameter, spinal canal area and spinal cord area at 1 year after surgery were statistically significant between the two groups (t=9.403, -2.855, -8.007, -2.447, all P values<0.05), and there were significant differences between the two groups before and after surgery (all P values<0.01)。 There was no significant difference between the two groups in the inter-vertebral height at 1 year after surgery (t=-0.534, P＞0.05), but there was a significant difference before and after surgery in the two groups(all P values<0.01).When the two groups of patients were followed up for 1 year, it was found that there was no significant difference in the number of postoperative axial symptoms between the two groups (P=0.705).Conclusions The combined surgery is more thorough than the traditional cervical anterior surgery and more conducive to the recovery of spinal cord function.At the same time, it effectively avoids the back of the neck soft tissue damage of the traditional posterior surgery.

Key words： Cervical spondylosis Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion Posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy

收稿日期: 2019-07-02

通讯作者: 张为,Email:zw_surgeon@sina.com

引用本文:

李泽阳, 李佳奇, 张飞, 孙亚彭, 郭磊, 张为, 王宪正, 崔浩, 高原. 前路减压联合后路内镜手术在 “钳夹式”颈椎病治疗中的应用[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2020, 25(3): 297-302.
Li Zeyang, Li Jiaqi, Zhang Fei, Sun Yapeng, Guo Lei, Zhang Wei, Wang Xianzheng, Cui Hao, Gao Yuan. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy for the treatment of “pinching” cervical spondylosis. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2020, 25(3): 297-302.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20190702-00209 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V25/I3/297

[1]	Penning L. Some aspects of plain radiography of the cervical spine in chronic myelopathy[J]. Neurology, 1962, 12: 513-519. DOI:10.1212/wnl.12.8.518.
[2]	Fraser JF, Hrtl R. Anterior approaches to fusion of the cervical spine: a metaanalysis of fusion rates[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2007, 6(4): 298-303. DOI:10.3171/spi.2007.6.4.2.
[3]	张颖, 王新伟, 陈华江, 等. 单纯前路手术治疗“钳夹型”颈椎病的疗效[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2012, 32(8): 714-720. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2012.08.002.Zhang Y, Wang XW, Chen HJ, et al. The effect of single anterior approach for pinching cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Chin J Orthop, 2012, 32(8): 714-720. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2012.08.002.
[4]	陈超, 王岩, 张雪松, 等. K线用于选择颈椎后纵韧带骨化症手术策略的回顾性分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2009, 19(11): 836-839. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2009.11.10.Chen C, Wang Y, Zhang XS, et al. A retrospective analysis on the role of K-line in determining surgical strategy for cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament[J]. Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord, 2009, 19(11): 836-839. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2009.11.10.
[5]	钱金黔. 前后联合入路治疗多节段颈椎管狭窄的临床效果评价[J]. 中外医学研究, 2015, (22): 50-51, 52. DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2015.22.026.Qian JQ. Evaluation of the clinical effect of combined anterior-posterior approach in the treatment of multi-segment cervical spinal stenosis[J]. Chinese and Foreign Medical Research, 2015, (22): 50-52. DOI:10.14033/j.cnki.cfmr.2015.22.026.
[6]	Kato S, Nouri A, Wu D, et al. Impact of cervical spine deformity on preoperative disease severity and postoperative outcomes following fusion surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy: sub-analysis of AO Spine North America and International Studies[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2018, 43(4): 248-254. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000002307.
[7]	Youn MS, Shon MH, Seong YJ, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of two-level endoscopic posterior cervical foraminotomy[J]. Eur Spine J, 2017, 26(9): 2450-2458. DOI:10.1007/s00586-017-5017-7.
[8]	Wagner R, Telfeian AE, Iprenburg M, et al. Minimally invasive fully endoscopic two-level posterior cervical foraminotomy: technical note[J]. J Spine Surg, 2017, 3(2): 238-242. DOI:10.21037/jss.2017.05.06.
[9]	Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, et al. Full-endoscopic cervical posterior foraminotomy for the operation of lateral disc herniations using 5.9-mm endoscopes: a prospective, randomized, controlled study[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(9): 940-948. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816c8b67.
[10]	Kim YU, Park JY, Kim DH, et al. The role of the ligamentum flavum area as a morphological parameter of lumbar central spinal stenosis[J]. Pain Physician, 2017, 20(3): E419-E424.
[11]	Kato M, Nakamura H, Konishi S, et al. Effect of preserving paraspinal muscles on postoperative axial pain in the selective cervical laminoplasty[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33(14): E455-E459. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e318178e607.
[12]	Umeda M, Sasai K, Kushida T, et al. A less-invasive cervical laminoplasty for spondylotic myelopathy that preserves the semispinalis cervicis muscles and nuchal ligament[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2013, 18(6): 545-552. DOI:10.3171/2013.2.SPINE12468.
[13]	Tamai K, Suzuki A, Terai H, et al. Laminar closure after expansive open-door laminoplasty: fixation methods and cervical alignments impact on the laminar closure and surgical outcomes[J]. Spine J, 2016, 16(9): 1062-1069. DOI:10.1016/j.spinee.2016.04.018.
[14]	Kawakami M, Tamaki T, Yoshida M, et al. Axial symptoms and cervical alignments after cervical anterior spinal fusion for patients with cervical myelopathy[J]. J Spinal Disord, 1999, 12(1): 50-56.
[15]	周非非, 孙宇, 张凤山, 等. 颈椎前路椎间盘切除、植骨融合内固定术治疗脊髓型颈椎病术后轴性症状的前瞻性研究[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2014, 24(6): 505-509. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2014.06.05.Zhou FF, Sun Y, Zhang FS, et al. Prospective study of axial symptoms after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating for cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord, 2014, 24(6): 505-509. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2014.06.05.
[16]	Okada Y, Ikata T, Katoh S, et al. Morphologic analysis of the cervical spinal cord, dural tube, and spinal canal by magnetic resonance imaging in normal adults and patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1994, 19(20): 2331-2335. DOI:10.1097/00007632-199410150-00014.
[17]	张春霖, 魏昱博, 李东哲, 等. 内窥镜下微创颈椎管扩大成形术治疗多节段脊髓型颈椎病的中长期疗效[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2018, 28(6): 481-487. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2018.06.01.Zhang CL, Wei YB, Li DZ, et al. The mid-long-term effect of minnimally invasive expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy using microendoscopy[J]. Chinese Journal of Spine and Spinal Cord, 2018, 28(6): 481-487. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2018.06.01.
[18]	Uematsu Y, Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H. Radiculopathy after laminoplasty of the cervical spine[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1998, 23(19): 2057-2062. DOI:10.1097/00007632-199810010-00004.
[19]	Kim CH, Shin KH, Chung CK, et al. Changes in cervical sagittal alignment after single-level posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical diskectomy[J]. Global Spine J, 2015, 5(1): 31-38. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1395423.
[20]	Lidar Z, Salame K. Minimally invasive posterior cervical discectomy for cervical radiculopathy: technique and clinical results[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2011, 24(8): 521-524. DOI:10.1097/BSD.0b013e31820679e3.
[21]	Quillo-Olvera J, Lin GX, Kim JS. Percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy: a technical review[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2018, 6(6): 100. DOI:10.21037/atm.2018.02.09.