基于人类进化节奏差异造成的人种胫骨平台解剖偏差对膝关节假体设计的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20220411-00107

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (3633 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的分析进口膝关节假体与国人胫骨平台截骨面的匹配程度,探讨其对膝关节假体设计的影响及人类进化节奏的差异。方法回顾性研究。选取2018年1月—2020年1月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科非膝关节疾病患者60例（120膝）、健康志愿者20名（40膝）,其中男46例（92膝）,女34例（68膝）,年龄24~72岁、平均46.8岁。均行双侧膝关节CT扫描及三维重建,并在高级图像工作站（GE ADW 4.3）上对三维重建的胫骨图像进行旋转、切割,测量并比较不同性别被试胫骨平台截骨面横径、前后径等线性参数的差异;采用5 mm容差范围法,分别评估按照白种人体质参数设计生产的Depuy-PFC sigma（假体A）、Link-Gemini MK-Ⅱ（假体B）、Zimmer-Nexgen（假体C）3种进口假体与成年国人胫骨平台截骨面的匹配率,并采用χ²检验进行比较。结果测得80例160膝成年国人胫骨平台截面横径为（74.2±2.8）mm,其中男性为（76.2±2.7）mm,大于女性的（68.1±2.9）mm,差异有统计学意义（t=18.18,P<0.001）;前后径为（48.2±2.6）mm,其中男性为（50.5±2.5）mm,大于女性的（46.3±2.7）mm,差异有统计学意义（t=10.15, P<0.001）。假体A、假体B、假体C与受试者胫骨平台截骨面的匹配率分别为41.25％（66/160）、46.88％（75/160）和26.25％（42/160）,假体C低于假体A和假体B,差异均有统计学意义（χ²=8.05、14.67,P值均<0.05）,而假体A与假体B间差异则无统计学意义（χ²=1.03,P=0.184）。结论基于白种人体质参数设计的进口膝关节假体与中国人胫骨平台截骨面的匹配度普遍较低;国人正常胫骨平台截骨面的几何形态同白种人有明显的区别,因此国人膝关节假体设计时不能照搬白种人的体质参数。中国人的胫骨平台截面相对较圆,因而推测在人类的进化过程中,中国人从四肢行走到直立行走可能较白种人更早。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	张博
	曲声赫
	赵志昕

关键词 ：关节成形术, 置换, 膝, 人类进化, 胫骨平台, 假体, 匹配率

Abstract：Objective This work aimed to explore the differences in human evolutionary rhythm, analyze the matching rate of imported knee prosthesis and the tibial plateau osteotomy surface of Chinese adults, and determine the influence of the tibial plateau on the design of knee prostheses. Methods In this study, 60 patients (120 knees) with non-knee diseases and 20 healthy volunteers (40 knees) were selected from the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2018 to January 2020. The patients included 46 males (92 knees) and 34 females (68 knees). The patients were 24-72 years old, with an average age of 46.8 years. Bilateral knee CT scan and 3D reconstruction were performed, and 3D reconstructed tibial images were rotated and cut on GE ADW 4.3 Advanced Image Workstation. Linear parameters such as transverse diameter and anteroposterior diameter of tibial plateau osteotomy surface were measured and calculated, and the differences in parameters between men and women were compared. Statistical analysis was performed. The matching rates of three imported knee prostheses designed based on Caucasian physique parameters (Depuy PFC Sigma [prosthesis A], Link-Gemini MK-II [prosthesis B], and Zimmer Nexgen [prosthesis C]) and the tibial plateau osteotomy surface of Chinese adults were evaluated using the 5 mm tolerance range method. Pairwise comparison was performed by χ² test. Results The mean cross diameter of the tibial plateau was (74.2±2.8) mm in 80 Chinese adults with 160 knees; that of males was (76.2±2.7) mm, which was higher than that of females (68.1 mm±2.9 mm), and the difference was significant (t=18.18, P <0.001). The mean diameter was (48.2±2.6) mm; that of males was (50.5±2.5) mm, which was higher than that of females (46.3 mm±2.7 mm), with statistical significance (t=10.15, P <0.001). The matching rates of prostheses A, B, and C with the tibial plateau osteotomy surface of Chinese adults were 41.25% (66/160), 46.88% (75/160), and 26.25% (42/160), respectively. The matching rates of prosthesis C were lower than those of prostheses A and B, and the differences were statistically significant (χ²=8.05, 14.67, all P values <0.05). No significant difference was found between prostheses A and B (χ²=1.03, P=0.184). Conclusion A significant difference is noted between Chinese adults and Caucasians in the normal bearing surface of the tibial plateau. The matching degree between imported knee prosthesis and the tibial plateau osteotomy surface of Chinese adults is generally low. The tibial plateau section of Chinese adults is relatively round, which suggests that in the course of human evolution, Chinese walked from four limbs to upright maybe earlier than Caucasians.

Key words： Arthroplasty replacement knee Human evolution Tibial plateau Prosthesis Matching rate

收稿日期: 2022-04-11

通讯作者: 赵志昕,Email：Zhaozx@medkr.com

引用本文:

张博, 曲声赫, 赵志昕. 基于人类进化节奏差异造成的人种胫骨平台解剖偏差对膝关节假体设计的影响[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2022, 27(9): 626-632.
Zhang Bo, Qu Shenghe, Zhao Zhixin. Effects of anatomical deviation of the human tibial plateau on knee prosthesis design based on human evolutionary rhythm differences. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2022, 27(9): 626-632.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20220411-00107 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V27/I9/626

[1]	沈律. 生物演化的自然均衡选择理论——对生物演化的实质及其规律的生物计量学分析[J].中国科技信息,2022,(1):19-24. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8972.2022.01.003.
[2]	Ponce de León MS, Bienvenu T, Marom A, et al. The primitive brain of early Homo[J]. Science, 2021,372(6538):165-171. DOI: 10.1126/science.aaz0032.
[3]	张人骧, 兰祖云, 瞿文吉, 等. 灵长目动物股骨膝关节面的对比研究[J].中国科学(B辑化学生物学农学医学地学),1987,(8):840-844.
[4]	Al-Otaibi ML, Alshumrani GA.Western-designed total knee implants mismatch Saudi patient knees. Anatomical bony measurements documented by computed tomography[J]. Saudi Med J, 2020,41(11):1227-1233. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2020.11.25467.
[5]	张博, 林源, 曲铁兵, 等. 国人胫骨平台截骨面与西方进口胫骨假体解剖学参数的偏差[J].中华骨科杂志,2014,34(4):394-399. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2014.04.008.Zhang B, Lin Y, Qu TB, et al.Anatomical differences between the resected tibial surface and tibial component in normal Chinese[J].Chin J Orthop,2014,34(4):394-399.DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2014.04.008.
[6]	王寿文, 冯传汉, 吕厚山, 等. 膝关节几何学研究及其对膝假体设计的意义[J].中华外科杂志,1992,30(7):434-439.
[7]	Tokunaga S, Rogge RD, Small SR, et al.A finite-element study of metal backing and tibial resection depth in a composite tibia following total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Biomech Eng, 2016,138(4):041001. DOI: 10.1115/1.4032551.
[8]	Bodden J, Ok AH, Joseph GB, et al.Joint-adjacent adipose tissue by MRI is associated with prevalence and progression of knee degenerative changes: data from the osteoarthritis initiative[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021,54(1):155-165. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27574.
[9]	Pangaud C, Laumonerie P, Dagneaux L, et al.Measurement of the posterior tibial slope depends on ethnicity, sex, and lower limb alignment: a computed tomography analysis of 378 healthy participants[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2020,8(1):2325967119895258. DOI: 10.1177/2325967119895258.
[10]	Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, et al.Anthropometry of the proximal tibia to design a total knee prosthesis for the Japanese population[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2002,17(8):1028-1032. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.35790.
[11]	Erkman MJ, Walker PS.A study of knee geometry applied to the design of condylar prostheses[J]. Biomed Eng, 1974,9(1):14-17.
[12]	Cheng CK, Lung CY, Lee YM, et al.A new approach of designing the tibial baseplate of total knee prostheses[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 1999,14(2):112-117. DOI: 10.1016/s0268-0033(98)00054-0.
[13]	Mak RW, Chau WW, Chung KY, et al.The long-term results of total knee arthroplasty in octogenarian[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2021,29(3):23094990211055226. DOI: 10.1177/23094990211055226.
[14]	Huijs S, Huysmans T, De Jong A, et al.Principal component analysis as a tool for determining optimal tibial baseplate geometry in modern TKA design[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2018,84(4):452-460.
[15]	Damsgaard CW, Gad BV, Bono OJ, et al.Intraoperative proximal tibia periprosthetic fractures in primary total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021,34(12):1269-1274. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1708037.
[16]	Bindelglass DF, Cohen JL, Dorr LD.Current principles of design for cemented and cementless knees[J]. Techniques in Orthopaedics, 1991, 6(4):80-85. DOI: 10.1097/00013611-199112000-00014.
[17]	Wevers HW, Simurda M, Griffin M, et al.Improved fit by asymmetric tibial prosthesis for total knee arthroplasty[J]. Med Eng Phys, 1994,16(4):297-300. DOI: 10.1016/1350-4533(94)90054-x.
[18]	Minoda Y, Ikebuchi M, Kobayashi A, et al.Medial peg position of cementless porous tantalum tibial component affects bone mineral density around the prosthesis after total knee arthroplasty: 2-year follow-up study[J]. Knee, 2022,34:55-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.11.005.
[19]	Stulberg BN, Dombrowski RM, Froimson M, et al.Computed tomography analysis of proximal tibial coverage[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995,(311):148-156.
[20]	Mensch JS, Amstutz HC.Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1975,(112):231-241.
[21]	Westrich GH, Haas SB, Insall JN, et al.Resection specimen analysis of proximal tibial anatomy based on 100 total knee arthroplasty specimens[J]. J Arthroplasty, 1995,10(1):47-51. DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(05)80100-7.
[22]	Uehara K, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, et al.Anthropometry of the proximal tibia to design a total knee prosthesis for the Japanese population[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2002,17(8):1028-1032. DOI: 10.1054/arth.2002.35790.
[23]	Maslin MA, Shultz S, Trauth MH.A synthesis of the theories and concepts of early human evolution[J]. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 2015,370(1663):20140064. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0064.