常规MRI联合分段读出平面回波弥散加权成像在颞骨良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200414-00126

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (1955 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨常规MRI联合分段读出平面回波弥散加权成像(RESOLVE-DWI)鉴别颞骨良、恶性肿瘤的价值。方法回顾性研究。纳入2014年1月—2019年12月复旦大学附属眼耳鼻喉科医院经病理学证实的96例颞骨肿瘤患者临床和影像资料。患者均在手术前2周内行颞骨常规MRI及RESOLVE-DWI检查,分别观察肿瘤大小(最大层面测量的病灶最大径)、形态、信号均匀性、边界及强化程度等图像特征,以及记录通过后处理软件在表观弥散加权成像图像上选择肿瘤实性区域手动绘制类圆形感兴趣区的表观弥散系数(ADC)。采用χ²检验和独立样本t检验比较良、恶性肿瘤的MRI信号特征及ADC值。绘制单独及联合常规MRI征像和RESOLVE-DWI测量的ADC值诊断颞骨良、恶性肿瘤的受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),并使用Delong检验比较诊断效能。结果良性肿瘤59例,男28例、女31例,年龄(44.63±12.97)岁,肿瘤大小(2.39±0.89)cm,类圆形/浅分叶41例、不规则形18例,边界清晰52例、模糊7例,信号均匀37例、不均匀22例,轻中度强化34例、明显强化25例;恶性肿瘤37例,男18例、女19例,年龄(50.27±17.25)岁,肿瘤大小(2.58±1.16)cm,类圆形/浅分叶23例、不规则形14例,边界清晰17例、模糊20例,信号均匀27例、不均匀10例,轻中度强化9例、明显强化28例。良、恶性颞骨肿瘤间,除肿瘤边界和强化程度差异有统计学意义(P值均＜0.01)外,患者年龄、性别以及MRI图像其他特征间差异均无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。颞骨恶性肿瘤的ADC值为(0.91 ± 0.23) ×10^-3 mm²/s,低于良性肿瘤组的 (1.09 ± 0.32) ×10^-3 mm²/s,差异有统计学意义(t=2.974, P＜0.01)。单独应用常规MRI和RESOLVE-DWI测量的ADC值诊断良、恶性颞骨肿瘤的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.771(95%可信区间0.639~0.903)和0.727(95%可信区间0.565~0.889),其灵敏度、特异度及准确度分别为68.42%、85.71%、75.08%和63.16%、71.43%、66.35%。联合应用常规MRI征象及RESOLVE-DWI测量的ADC值诊断良、恶性颞骨肿瘤的AUC值为0.907(95%可信区间0.816~0.998),其灵敏度、特异度及准确度分别为89.47%、80.95%和86.19%。联合应用常规MRI及RESOLVE-DWI的AUC显著高于分别单独应用常规MRI和RESOLVE-DWI(Z=2.463、2.243, P值均＜0.05)。结论常规MRI及RESOLVE-DWI在鉴别颞骨良、恶性肿瘤中具有重要价值,二者联合应用能有效提高其鉴别诊断效能。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王鹏
	肖泽彬
	唐作华
	洪汝建

关键词 ：颅骨肿瘤, 颞骨肿瘤, 磁共振成像, 弥散加权成像, 分段读出平面回波, 表观弥散系数

Abstract：Objective To evaluate the value of conventional MRI combined with readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion weighted imaging (RESOLVE-DWI) to differentiate the benign from the malignant tumors of the temporal bone. Methods The clinical and imaging data of 96 patients with temporal bone tumors, as confirmed by histopathology, were retrospectively analyzed in Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University from January 2014 to December 2019. Conventional MRI and RESOLVE-DWI were performed on all patients within 2 weeks before surgery. The following features were assessed with conventional MRI: tumor size (maximum diameters on the maximum transverse plane), shape, signal uniformity, boundary, and enhancement degree. Using post-processing software, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were obtained by drawing freehand circular regions of interest on the solid area of the tumor. The conventional MRI features and ADC values of benign and malignant tumors were compared by using the chi-square test and t-test. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of conventional MRI and ADC values alone or in combination was obtained to differentiate the benign from the malignant tumors of the temporal bone. The Delong test was used to compare the diagnostic efficiency. Results Fifty-nine patients, including 28 males and 31 females, had benign tumor of the temporal bone. They had an average age of 44.63±12.97 years old. Conventional MRI results showed that the benign tumors were 2.39±0.89 cm in size; some of these benign tumors were oval/slightly lobulated in shape (n=41), whereas others had an irregular shape (n=18), a well-defined boundary (n=52), an ill-defined boundary (n=7), a homogeneous signal (n=37), a heterogeneous signal (n=22), mild/moderate enhancement (n=34), and obvious enhancement (n=25). Thirty-seven patients, including 18 males and 19 females, had malignant tumor of the temporal bone. Their average age was 50.27±17.25 years old. Conventional MRI results showed that the malignant tumors were 2.58±1.16 cm in size; some of these malignant tumors were oval/slightly lobulated in shape (n=23), whereas others had an irregular shape (n=14), a well-defined boundary (n=17), an ill-defined boundary (n=20), a homogeneous signal (n=27), a heterogeneous signal (n=10), mild/moderate enhancement (n=9), and obvious enhancement (n=28). The tumor boundary and enhancement degree were statistically significant (all P values＜0.01) and could be used to distinguish the benign from the malignant tumors of the temporal bone. No significant differences was found for age, gender, or other features scanned by conventional MRI (all P values> 0.05). The ADC value of malignant tumor was (0.91±0.23)×10^-3 mm²/s, which was lower than that of benign tumor (1.09±0.32)×10^-3 mm²/s, and the difference was statistically significant (t=2.974, P＜0.01). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of conventional MRI in the differential diagnosis of the benign and malignant tumors of the temporal bone was 0.771 (95% CI 0.639-0.903) with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 68.42%, 85.71%, and 75.08%, respectively. The AUC of the ADC value was 0.727 (95% CI 0.565-0.889) with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 63.16%, 71.43%, and 66.35%, respectively. The AUC of the combination of conventional MRI and RESOLVE-DWI was 0.907 (95% CI 0.816-0.998) with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of 89.47%, 80.95%, and 86.19%, respectively. The AUC value of the combination of conventional MRI with RESOLVE-DWI was significantly higher than the individual AUC values of these methods when used on their own (Z=2.463, 2.243, all P values＜0.05). Conclusions Conventional MRI and RESOLVE-DWI are of great value in the differential diagnosis of the benign and malignant tumors of the temporal bone. Their combination can further improve the diagnostic efficiency.

Key words： Skull neoplasms Temporal bone tumor Magnetic resonance imaging Diffusion weighted imaging Readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains Apparent diffusion coefficient

收稿日期: 2020-04-14

基金资助:上海市科委引导性项目(17411962100)

通讯作者: 唐作华,Email:tzh518sunny@163.com

引用本文:

王鹏, 肖泽彬, 唐作华, 洪汝建. 常规MRI联合分段读出平面回波弥散加权成像在颞骨良恶性肿瘤鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2020, 25(6): 606-611.
Wang Peng, Xiao Zebin, Tang Zuohua, Hong Rujian. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant tumors of temporal bone by conventional MRI combined with readout segmentation of long variable echo-trains diffusion weighted imaging. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2020, 25(6): 606-611.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200414-00126 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V25/I6/606

[1]	da Silva AP, Breda E, Monteiro E. Malignant tumors of the temporal bone-our experience[J]. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2016, 82(4): 479-483. DOI:10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.09.010.
[2]	Touska P, Juliano AF.Temporal bone tumors: an imaging update[J]. Neuroimaging Clin N Am, 2019, 29(1): 145-172. DOI:10.1016/j.nic.2018.09.007.
[3]	McClellan JH, Ewing E, Gupta S. Squamous papilloma of the external auditory canal[J]. Otol Neurotol, 2018, 39(5): e413-e415. DOI:10.1097/MAO.0000000000001783.
[4]	史珣贝, 戴春富. 颞骨恶性肿瘤临床诊疗的现状[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2019, 17(3): 311-316. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.03.007.Shi XB, Dai CF.Current opinions on clinical diagnosis and treatment of temporal bone malignancy[J]. Chin J Otol, 2019, 17(3): 311-316. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.03.007.
[5]	Tu Z, Xiao Z, Zheng Y, et al.Benign and malignant skull-involved lesions: discriminative value of conventional CT and MRI combined with diffusion-weighted MRI[J]. Acta Radiol, 2019, 60(7): 880-886. DOI:10.1177/0284185118773541.
[6]	Lee FK, King AD, Ma BB, et al.Dynamic contrast enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) for differential diagnosis in head and neck cancers[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(4): 784-788. DOI:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.089.
[7]	郑梅竹, 刘松, 汤若薇, 等. 颞骨肿瘤动态增强MRI定量参数与肿瘤定性的初步研究[J]. 中华耳科学杂志, 2018, 16(5): 604-610. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.05.004.Zheng MZ, Liu S, Tang RW, et al.Dynamic contrast-enhanced mri of temporal bone tumors: a preliminary study of correlation between quantitative parameters and malignancy[J]. Chin J Otol, 2018, 16(5): 604-610. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2018.05.004.
[8]	鲜军舫, 王振常, 梁熙虹, 等. 颞骨肿块的影像学研究[J].中华放射学杂志, 2003, 37(9): 819-822. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2003.09.014.Xian JF, Wang ZC, Liang XH, et al.Imaging investigation of the masses of temporal bone[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2003, 37(9): 819-822. DOI:10.3760/j.issn:1005-1201.2003.09.014.
[9]	王颖, 王国杰, 叶颖, 等. 鼻咽癌高分辨率扩散加权成像特征分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(17): 1303-1306. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.17.006.Wang Y, Wang GJ, Ye Y, et al.High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging for characterising nasopharyngeal carcinoma[J]. Natl Med J China, 2017, 97(17): 1303-1306. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2017.17.006.
[10]	陈文, 胡昊, 许晓泉, 等. RESOLVE-DWI在甲状腺相关眼病诊断和分期中的应用价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2019, 35(7): 1050-1053. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2019.07.006.Chen W, Hu H, Xu XQ, et al.Clinical value of RESOLVE-DWI in the diagnosis and staging of thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy[J]. J Pract Radiol, 2019, 35(7): 1050-1053. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2019.07.006.
[11]	马晓璐, 沈浮, 王振, 等. 高分辨力DWI-RESOLVE序列在直肠癌术前T分期中的价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2017, 32(9): 947-950. DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2017.09.011.Ma XL, Shen F, Wang Z, et al.The value of high resolution DWI-RESOLVE sequence in the preoperative T staging of rectal cancer[J]. Radiol Practice, 2017, 32(9): 947-950. DOI:10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2017.09.011.
[12]	沈杰, 许晓泉, 胡昊, 等. 常规MRI联合扩散加权成像鉴别诊断眼眶淋巴增生性疾病的价值[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2016, 50(6): 412-415. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2016.06.003.Shen J, Xu XQ, Hu H, et al.The value of conventional MRI combined with diffusion weighted imaging in the differential diagnosis of orbital lymphoproliferative disorders[J]. Chin J Radiol, 2016, 50(6): 412-415. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-1201.2016.06.003.
[13]	姜家锁, 苏国义, 胡昊, 等. 分段读出扩散加权成像在腮腺肿瘤鉴别诊断中的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2019, 35(12): 1914-1917. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2019.12.007.Jiang JS, Su GY, Hu H, et al.The value of RESOLVE-DWI in differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors[J]. J Pract Radiol, 2019, 35(12): 1914-1917. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1002-1671.2019.12.007.
[14]	王永哲, 鲜军舫, 杨本涛, 等. 3.0T磁共振扩散加权成像表观扩散系数对泪腺肿瘤性病变的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2019, 99(1): 53-56. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.01.012.Wang YZ, Xian JF, Yang BT, et al.Value of the apparent diffusion coefficient in diffusion weighted imaging at 3.0T MR for differentiating lacrimal gland tumors[J]. Natl Med J China, 2019, 99(1): 53-56. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2019.01.012.