Abstract：Objective To study the one, two and three-dimensional distribution of posterior malleolus fracture lines in ankle fracture of supination-external rotation.Methods Computed tomography scans of a consecutive series and clinical data of 70 ankle fractures of supination-external rotation type Ⅲ/Ⅳ treated in Tongji Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University from January 2012 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The initial digital imaging files were analyzed by Mimics 16.0 and 3D reconstruction. The three-dimensional fracture lines were identified using 3-Matic software after virtual fracture reduction. The three-dimensional fracture lines of all posterior malleolar fracture blocks were drawn in the same three-dimensional image after standardization. Then, a heatmap of fracture line and surface was drawn.Results Although the distribution of posterior malleolus intra-articular fracture lines varied, most of them were concentrated in a curved region. This region started at 1/7-2/7 tangent of the posterior edge in the posterior malleolusa standardized image and ended at 5/11-7/11 . The proportion of the articular surface of posterior malleolus fracture fragment to the total area of articular surface was averaged 14.96% (range, from 2.23% to 38.45%). The region with the highest frequency of the three-dimensional fracture block was located in the posterior 2/11 at bottom view, in the posterior 1/9 at standard medial view and in the posterior 1/11 at lateral view.Conclusions The position of the posterior malleolus fracture is highly variable, and most of the fracture block is located in the posterolateral side, which are mainly Haraguchi type I or Bartonicek-Rammelt type 2 fractures. The line-surface-3D study of posterior malleolus fractures facilitates the development of surgical plans, the exploration of injury mechanisms, and provides a theoretical basis for biomechanical or finite element modeling.
Koval KJ, Lurie J, Zhou W, et al. Ankle fractures in the elderly: what you get depends on where you live and who you see？[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2005, 19(9): 635-639. DOI:10.1097/01.bot.0000177105.53708.a9.
[2]
De Vries JS, Wijgman AJ, Sierevelt IN, et al. Long-term results of ankle fractures with a posterior malleolar fragment[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2005, 44(3): 211-217. DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2005.02.002.
[3]
Hartford JM, Gorczyca JT, McNamara JL, et al. Tibiotalar contact area. Contribution of posterior malleolus and deltoid ligament[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1995(320): 182-187.
[4]
Donohoe S, Alluri RK, Hill JR, et al. Impact of computed tomography on operative planning for ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2017, 38(12): 1337-1342. DOI:10.1177/1071100717731568.
[5]
Switaj PJ, Weatherford B, Fuchs D, et al. Evaluation of posterior malleolar fractures and the posterior pilon variant in operatively treated ankle fractures[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2014, 35(9): 886-895. DOI:10.1177/1071100714537630.
[6]
Odak S, Ahluwalia R, Unnikrishnan P, et al. Management of posterior malleolar fractures: a systematic review[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2016, 55(1): 140-145. DOI:10.1053/j.jfas.2015.04.001.
[7]
Fitzpatrick E, Goetz JE, Sittapairoj T, et al. Effect of posterior malleolus fracture on syndesmotic reduction: a cadaveric study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2018, 100(3): 243-248. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.17.00217.
[8]
Büchler L, Tannast M, Bonel HM, et al. Reliability of radiologic assessment of the fracture anatomy at the posterior tibial plafond in malleolar fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23(3): 208-212. DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e31819b0b23.
[9]
Meijer DT, Doornberg JN, Sierevelt IN, et al. Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs[J]. Injury, 2015, 46(10): 2024-2029. DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.019.
[10]
Haraguchi N, Haruyama H, Toga H, et al. Pathoanatomy of posterior malleolar fractures of the ankle[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(5): 1085-1092. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.E.00856.
[11]
Bartoníˇcek J, Rammelt S, Kostlivˇy K, et al. Anatomy and classification of the posterior tibial fragment in ankle fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(4): 505-516. DOI:10.1007/s00402-015-2171-4.
Meijer DT, de Muinck Keizer RJ, Doornberg JN, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 2-dimensional computed tomography for articular involvement and fracture pattern of posterior malleolar fractures[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2016, 37(1): 75-82. DOI:10.1177/1071100715603999.
[14]
Donohoe S, Alluri RK, Hill JR, et al. Impact of computed tomography on operative planning for ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2017, 38(12): 1337-1342. DOI:10.1177/1071100717731568.
[15]
Palmanovich E, Brin YS, Laver L, et al. The effect of minimally displaced posterior malleolar fractures on decision making in minimally displaced lateral malleolus fractures[J]. Int Orthop, 2014, 38(5): 1051-1056. DOI:10.1007/s00264-013-2224-7.
[16]
Cole PA, Mehrle RK, Bhandari M, et al. The pilon map: fracture lines and comminution zones in OTA/AO type 43C3 pilon fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2013, 27(7): e152-e156. DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318288a7e9.
[17]
Armitage BM, Wijdicks CA, Tarkin IS, et al. Mapping of scapular fractures with three-dimensional computed tomography[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(9): 2222-2228. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.H.00881.
[18]
Raasch WG, Larkin JJ, Draganich LF. Assessment of the posterior malleolus as a restraint to posterior subluxation of the ankle[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1992, 74(8): 1201-1206.
[19]
Scheidt KB, Stiehl JB, Skrade DA, et al. Posterior malleolar ankle fractures: an in vitro biomechanical analysis of stability in the loaded and unloaded states[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1992, 6(1): 96-101.
[20]
Fitzpatrick DC, Otto JK, McKinley TO, et al. Kinematic and contact stress analysis of posterior malleolus fractures of the ankle[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2004, 18(5): 271-278. DOI:10.1097/00005131-200405000-00002.
[21]
Maynard SD, Hughes JR. A distinctive electrographic entity: bursts of rhythmical temporal theta[J]. Clin Electroencephalogr, 1984, 15(3): 145-150.
[22]
Bennett C, Behn A, Daoud A, et al. Buttress plating versus anterior-to-posterior lag screws for fixation of the posterior malleolus: a biomechanical study[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(12): 664-669. DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000699.
[23]
Anwar A, Lv D, Zhao Z, et al. Finite element analysis of the three different posterior malleolus fixation strategies in relation to different fracture sizes[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(4): 825-832. DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2017.02.012.
[24]
O'Connor TJ, Mueller B, Ly TV, et al. “A to p” screw versus posterolateral plate for posterior malleolus fixation in trimalleolar ankle fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(4): e151-e156. DOI:10.1097/BOT.0000000000000230.
[25]
Erdem MN, Erken HY, Burc H, et al. Comparison of lag screw versus buttress plate fixation of posterior malleolar fractures[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2014, 35(10): 1022-1030. DOI:10.1177/1071100714540893.
[26]
Tenenbaum S, Shazar N, Bruck N, et al. Posterior malleolus fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2017, 48(1): 81-89. DOI:10.1016/j.ocl.2016.08.004.
2019, Vol. 24 
