不同材料内固定手术治疗多发肋骨骨折的临床效果分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210206-00035

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (2566 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨环抱器、锁定板、环抱器-锁定板联合内固定手术治疗创伤性多发肋骨骨折的临床疗效。方法回顾性研究。纳入2018年1月—2020年12月厦门市第五医院胸外科96例创伤性多发肋骨骨折患者的临床资料,其中男67例、女29例,年龄24～79(49.2±13.8)岁,均采用内固定手术治疗。根据内固定材料不同分组:选用镍钛记忆合金环抱器固定37例为环抱器组,解剖型锁定接骨板固定38例为锁定板组,两种材料联合使用21例为联合组。比较三组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、伤口引流量、术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、围术期并发症等。结果三组患者的性别、年龄、骨折断端数目、骨折部位、胸部并发症等基线资料差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05)。患者手术均顺利,术后随访3~24个月,均未发生环抱器或接骨板、螺钉脱落等。环抱器组患者手术时间为(8.51±0.89)min,优于联合组的(13.50±1.83)min及锁定板组的(15.27±1.42)min,差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.01);三组中锁定板组术中出血量[(96.34±6.59)mL]最少,与另外两组比较差异均有统计学意义(P值均＜0.01)。三组患者伤口引流量、术后24 h疼痛VAS评分以及肺不张、切口感染等并发症差异均无统计学意义(P值均＞0.05)。结论采用环抱器、锁定板、环抱器-锁定板联合内固定手术治疗多发肋骨骨折均安全有效,环抱器组所需手术时间最短,锁定板组术中出血量最少。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	胡睿
	姜杰
	王端端
	万国斌
	耿国军
	邢宇彤

关键词 ：肋骨骨折, 骨折固定术,内, 连枷胸, 外科手术

Abstract：Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of an embracing device, locking plate, and the combination of both with internal fixation in the treatment of traumatic multiple rib fractures.Methods The clinical data of 67 males and 29 females, aged from 24-79(49.2±13.8) years and who underwent internal fixation of rib fracture from January 2018 to December 2020 at the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery of Xiamen Fifth Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. The cases were classified according to different groups of internal fixation materials include 37 cases with NiTi memory embracing device as the embracing device group, 38 cases with anatomical locking plates as the locking plate group, and 21 cases as the combined group. The operative time, intraoperative bleeding, drainage volume and drainage time, pain score, and postoperative complications were recorded.Results Rib fracture fixation was successfully performed in all patients. No significant differences occurred in terms of gender, age, number of fracture ends, fracture location and chest complications, among the three groups (all P values＞0.05). The operative time for each fracture (embracing fixator [8.51±0.89] min vs. mix group [13.50±1.83] min and locking plate [15.27±1.42] min) significantly differed (all P values＜0.01). Intraoperative bleeding for the various groups (embracing fixator [118.21±7.96] mL vs. mix group [103.74±7.38] mL and locking plate [96.34±6.59] mL) significantly differed (all P values＜0.01). No significant difference was observed in the drainage volume, chest pain, atelectasis, and wound infection among the three groups (all P values＞0.05).Conclusions The clinical application of an embracing device, locking plate, and the combination of both is safe and effective for the treatment of multiple rib fractures, with the embracing device achieving the shortest operation time. The least amount of intraoperative bleeding is observed for the locking plate group.

Key words： Rib fractures Fracture fixation,internal Flail chest Surgical procedures,operative

收稿日期: 2021-02-06

通讯作者: 邢宇彤,Email: xingyt@163.com

引用本文:

胡睿, 姜杰, 王端端, 万国斌, 耿国军, 邢宇彤. 不同材料内固定手术治疗多发肋骨骨折的临床效果分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2021, 26(6): 685-689.
Hu Rui, Jiang Jie, Wang Duanduan, Wan Guobin, Geng Guojun, Xing Yutong. Clinical analysis of different internal fixation materials in the treatment of multiple rib fractures. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2021, 26(6): 685-689.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210206-00035 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2021/V26/I6/685

[1]	何哲, 乔贵宾, 徐恩五. 手术治疗重度肋骨骨折的疗效及经济学分析[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2014, 30(12): 1201-1204. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2014.12.009.
	He Z, Qiao GB, Xu EW. Effect and economic analysis of operative treatment of severe rib fracture[J]. Chin J Trauma, 2014, 30(12): 1201-1204. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2014.12.009.
[2]	Sharma OP, Oswanski MF, Jolly S, et al. Perils of rib fractures[J]. Am Surg, 2008, 74(4): 310-314. DOI:10.1177/000313480807400406.
[3]	Slobogean GP, Kim H, Russell JP, et al. Rib fracture fixation restores inspiratory volume and peak flow in a full thorax human cadaveric breathing model[J]. Arch Trauma Res, 2015, 4(4): e28018. DOI:10.5812/atr.28018.
[4]	徐恩五, 乔贵宾, 彭秀凡, 等. 记忆合金环抱器固定肋骨骨折的适应证及手术技巧[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2012, 28(6): 533-536. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2012.06.014.
	Xu EW, Qiao GB, Peng XF, et al. Indications and surgical techniques of fixation of rib fractures with memory alloy osteosynthesis plates[J]. Chin J Trauma, 2012, 28(6): 533-536. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2012.06.014.
[5]	Caragounis EC, Fagevik Olsén M, Pazooki D, et al. Surgical treatment of multiple rib fractures and flail chest in trauma: a one-year follow-up study[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2016, 11: 27. DOI:10.1186/s13017-016-0085-2.
[6]	Bemelman M, de Kruijf MW, van Baal M, et al. Rib fractures: to fix or not to fix An evidence-based algorithm[J]. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2017, 50(4): 229-234. DOI:10.5090/kjtcs.2017.50.4.229.
[7]	Beks RB, Peek J, de Jong MB, et al. Fixation of flail chest or multiple rib fractures: current evidence and how to proceed. A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2019, 45(4): 631-644. DOI:10.1007/s00068-018-1020-x.
[8]	Balci AE, Eren S, Cakir O, et al. Open fixation in flail chest: review of 61 patients[J]. Asian Cadiovasc Thorac Ann, 2004, 12(1): 11-15. DOI:10.1177/021849230401200104.
[9]	Pieracci FM, Leasia K, Bauman Z, et al. A multicenter, prospective, controlled clinical trial of surgical stabilization of rib fractures in patients with severe, nonflail fracture patterns (Chest Wall Injury Society NONFLAIL)[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020, 88(2): 249-257. DOI:10.1097/TA.0000000000002559.
[10]	Pieracci FM, Majercik S, Ali-Osman F, et al. Consensus statement: surgical stabilization of rib fractures rib fracture colloquium clinical practice guidelines[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(2): 307-321. DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2016.11.026.
[11]	乔贵宾, 陈刚. 创伤性肋骨骨折的处理: 广东胸外科行业共识(2017年版)[J]. 中国胸心血管外科临床杂志, 2018, 25(5): 362-367. DOI:10.7507/1007-4848.201710008.
	Qiao GB, Chen G. Surgical management of traumatic rib fractures: a consensus atatement by Guangdong association for thoracic surgery (version 2017)[J]. Chinese Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2018, 25(5): 362-367. DOI:10.7507/ 1007-4848.201710008.
[12]	Zhou X, Zhang D, Xie Z, et al. 3D printing and thoracoscopy assisted MIPO in treatment of long-range comminuted rib fractures, a case report[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2019, 14(1): 83. DOI:10.1186/s13019-019-0892-0.
[13]	徐凤阳, 王楠, 任佳, 等. 解剖型和爪形接骨板固定肋骨骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华急诊医学杂志, 2019, 28(2): 232-235. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.02.021.
	Xu FY, Wang N, Ren J, et al. Comparison of the therapeutic effect between anatomical plates and claw-type bone plates in fixation of multiple rib fractures[J].Chin J Emerg Med, 2019, 28(2): 232-235. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-0282.2019.02.021.
[14]	Zhang Q, Song L, Ning S, et al. Recent advances in rib fracture fixation[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(Suppl 8): S1070-S1077. DOI:10.21037/jtd.2019.04.99.
[15]	Zhou XT, Zhang DS, Yang Y, et al. Analysis of the advantages of 3D printing in the surgical treatment of multiple rib fractures: 5 cases report[J]. J Cardiothorac Surg, 2019, 14(1): 105. DOI:10.1186/s13019-019-0930-y.
[16]	Pieracci FM. Completely thoracoscopic surgical stabilization of rib fractures: can it be done and is it worth it?[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2019, 11(Suppl 8): S1061-S1069. DOI:10.21037/jtd.2019.01.70.
[17]	张继军, 洪琼川, 莫晓潮, 等. 专利器械腔镜接骨板行完全胸腔镜肋骨骨折记忆合金内固定术[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(10): 896-900. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2020.10.008.
	Zhang JJ, Hong QC, Mo XC, et al. Use of patented thoracoscopic rib plate in total video-assisted thoracoscopic memory alloy internal fixation for rib fractures[J]. Chin J Min Inv Surg, 2020, 20(10): 896-900. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6604.2020.10.008.