改良Giftbox缝合法联合束状捆扎技术治疗急性跟腱断裂的疗效分析

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210423-00114

摘要
图/表
参考文献(27)
相关文章 (3)

全文: PDF (6134 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨改良的Giftbox缝合法联合束状捆扎技术治疗急性跟腱断裂的手术疗效。方法回顾性研究。纳入徐州市中心医院手足显微外科2016年1月—2018年12月急性跟腱断裂患者38例,其中男32例、女6例,年龄17~73（39.2±16.8）岁,左侧18例、右侧20例。均采用改良Giftbox缝合联合束状捆扎法行跟腱切开缝合术。观察患者手术前后美国矫形外科足踝协会踝-后足评分系统（AOFAS）评分的变化;末次随访时,对比患者两侧小腿周径,采用跟腱完全断裂评分系统（ATRS）进行评分,并以Amer-Lindholm评分评价手术疗效。结果本组38例患者均完成手术,术后均获随访,随访时间为（9.1±3.4）个月。末期随访时：患者AOFAS评分为（90.7±3.0）分,较术前的（45.2±4.4）分明显提高,差异有统计学意义（t=57.97, P<0.001）;ATRS评分为（80.3±6.3）分;患者小腿周径患侧为（38.9±4.3）cm、健侧为（39.3±4.4）cm,两侧比较差异有统计学意义（t=-3.63,P=0.001）。按Amer-Lindholm评分评价,本组疗效优20例、良17例、差1例,优良率为97.4%（37/38）。结论利用改良Giftbox缝合法联合束状捆扎技术治疗急性跟腱断裂效果确切,跟腱长度和强度恢复良好。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	范家强
	郝云甲
	张在轶
	王爱国

关键词 ：跟腱, 断裂, Giftbox缝合法, 束状捆扎

Abstract：Objective To evaluate the effect of modified Giftbox suture combined with bundle binding technique in treating acute Achilles tendon rupture. Methods A total of 38 patients, including 32 males and 6 females, with acute Achilles tendon rupture in XuZhou Central Hospital from January 2016 to December 2018 were studied retrospectively. The average age of the patients was 17-73(39.2 ± 16.8) years old, and the ratio of the left and right sides was 18:20. All patients underwent the operation of Achilles tendon incision and suture with the specific operation method, that is, modified giftbox suture combined with bundle binding technique. The changes of the ankle hindfoot scoring system of American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Association Score (AOFAS) before and after operation were observed. At the last follow-up, the peripheral diameters of both legs were compared, the Achilles tendon rupture score (ATRS) was obtained, and the surgical effect was evaluated by Amer Lindholm score. Results The operation was performed in all 38 patients and the postoperative follow-up was conducted. The follow-up time was (9.1 ± 3.4) months. At the end of the follow-up, the AOFAS score was 90.7±3.0, which was higher than that before surgery at 45.2±4.4. The difference was statistically significant (t = 57.97, P<0.001). The ATRS score was 80.3±6.3. The calf circumference of the 38 patients was (38.9± 4.3)cm on the affected side and (39.3 ± 4.4)cm on the healthy side. The difference was statistically significant between the two sides (t = -3.63, P=0.001). According to Amer-Lindholm score, 20 patients scored excellent, 17 patients scored good, and 1 patient scored fair, and the rate of excellent and good efficacy was 97.4% (37/38). Conclusions The modified Giftbox suture combined with bundles binding technique is effective in treating acute Achilles tendon rupture, which can restore the length and strength of the Achilles tendon.

Key words： Achilles tendon Rupture Giftbox suture Bundles binding

收稿日期: 2021-04-23

通讯作者: 王爱国,Email：wangaiguo2008@163.com

引用本文:

范家强, 郝云甲, 张在轶, 王爱国. 改良Giftbox缝合法联合束状捆扎技术治疗急性跟腱断裂的疗效分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2022, 27(1): 30-34.
Fan Jiaqiang, Hao Yunjia, Zhang Zaiyi, Wang aiguo. Clinical analysis of modified Giftbox suture combined with bundle binding technique in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2022, 27(1): 30-34.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210423-00114 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V27/I1/30

[1]	中国医师协会骨科医师分会,中国医师协会骨科医师分会«急性跟腱断裂循证临床诊疗指南»编辑委员会. 中国医师协会骨科医师分会循证临床诊疗指南:急性跟腱断裂循证临床诊疗指南[J].中华外科杂志, 2015,53(8): 561-563. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2015.08.001.
[2]	Wang X, Liu H, Li D, et al.Modified Bunnell suture repair versus bundle-to-bundle suture repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective comparative study of patients aged <45 years[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2020,21(1):580. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-020-03588-5.
[3]	Tian J, Rui R, Xu Y, et al.Achilles tendon rupture repair: Biomechanical comparison of the locking block modified Krackow technique and the Giftbox technique[J]. Injury, 2020,51(2):559-564. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2019.10.019.
[4]	Tian J, Rui Y, Xu Y, et al.A biomechanical comparison of Achilles tendon suture repair techniques: Locking Block Modified Krackow, Kessler, and Percutaneous Achilles Repair System with the early rehabilitation program in vitro bovine model[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020,140(11):1775-1782. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03535-y.
[5]	Bilge A, Kuru T.Results of surgical management of Achilles tendon rupture using the modified Lindholm procedure[J]. Cureus, 2020,12(7):e9159. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.9159.
[6]	Van Lieshout EM, De Boer AS, Meuffels DE, et al.American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version[J]. BMJ Open, 2017,7(2):e012884. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012884.
[7]	Nilsson-Helander K, Thomeé R, Silbernagel KG, et al.The Achilles tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS): development and validation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2007,35(3):421-426. DOI: 10.1177/0363546506294856.
[8]	詹俊锋,方家刘,张积森,等. 改良缝合法治疗急性闭合性跟腱断裂的疗效分析[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,31(8):952-956. DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201702090.
	Zhan JF, Fang JL, Zhang JS, et al.Effectiveness of modified suture technique in treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture[J]. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery,2017,31(8):952-956. DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201702090.
[9]	赵嘉国,郭文煊,曾宪铁,等. 急性跟腱断裂术后早期功能锻炼的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2019,33(3):382-386. DOI:10.7507/1002-1892.201807146.
	Zhao JG, Guo WX, Zeng XT, et al.Research progress of early postoperative rehabilitation for acute Achilles tendon rupture after surgical repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery, 2019,33(3):382-386. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807146.
[10]	Park YH, Lim JW, Choi GW, et al.Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the common site of acute achilles tendon rupture: 5 to 8 cm above the distal end of the calcaneal insertion[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019,47(10):2374-2379. DOI: 10.1177/0363546519858990.
[11]	Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, et al.Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012,94(23):2136-2143. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00917.
[12]	Deng S, Sun Z, Zhang C, et al.Surgical treatment versus conservative management for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2017,56(6):1236-1243. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2017.05.036.
[13]	Park SH, Lee HS, Young KW, et al.Treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2020,12(1):1-8. DOI: 10.4055/cios.2020.12.1.1.
[14]	Grassi A, Amendola A, Samuelsson K, et al.Minimally invasive versus open repair for acute Achilles tendon rupture: meta-analysis showing reduced complications, with similar outcomes, after minimally invasive surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2018,100(22):1969-1981. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01364.
[15]	Lui TH.Editorial Commentary: is endoscopy really helpful during repair of acute rupture of the Achilles tendon?[J]. Arthroscopy,2018,34(4):1270-1271.DOI:10.1016/j.arthro.2017.11.017.
[16]	Yang B, Liu Y, Kan S, et al.Outcomes and complications of percutaneous versus open repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2017,40:178-186. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.021.
[17]	Wilkins R, Bisson LJ.Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: a quantitative systematic review of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012,40(9):2154-2160. DOI: 10.1177/0363546512453293.
[18]	Li Q, Wang C, Huo Y, et al.Minimally invasive versus open surgery for acute Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016,11(1):65. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-016-0401-2.
[19]	Labib SA, Rolf R, Dacus R, et al.The "Giftbox" repair of the Achilles tendon: a modification of the Krackow technique[J]. Foot Ankle Int, 2009,30(5):410-414. DOI: 10.3113/FAI-2009-0410.
[20]	Frantz TL, EverhartJS, Jamieson M, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of Achilles tendon repair using the modified Gift-Box technique with nonabsorbable suture loop: a consecutive case series[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2019, 58(4): 696-701.DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.034.
[21]	王成林, 曹开学, 杨俊忠. 采用束间缝合法治疗急性跟腱断裂的疗效观察[J]. 中国骨伤, 2018,31(2):183-185. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.018.
	Wang CL, Cao KX, Yang JZ.Clinical therapeutic effect of a new bundle-to-bundle suturing method for acute Achilles tendon rupture[J]. Zhongguo Gu Shang, 2018, 31(2):183-185. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2018.02.018.
[22]	Li CG, Li B, Yang YF.Management of acute Achilles tendon rupture with tendon-bundle technique[J]. J Int Med Res, 2017,45(1):310-319. DOI: 10.1177/0300060516677928.
[23]	Frantz TL, Everhart JS, Jamieson M, et al.Patient-reported outcomes of Achilles tendon repair using the modified Gift-Box technique with nonabsorbable suture loop: a consecutive case series[J]. J Foot Ankle Surg, 2019,58(4):696-701. DOI: 10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.034.
[24]	Yang X, Meng H, Quan Q, et al.Management of acute Achilles tendon ruptures: A review[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2018,7(10):561-569. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.710.BJR-2018-0004.R2.
[25]	Heikkinen J, Lantto I, Piilonen J, et al.Tendon length, calf muscle atrophy, and strength deficit after acute Achilles tendon rupture: long-term follow-up of patients in a previous study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2017,99(18):1509-1515. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01491.
[26]	赵嘉国,郭文煊,曾宪铁,等. 急性跟腱断裂术后早期功能锻炼的研究进展[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2019,33(3):382-386. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807146.
	Zhao JG, Guo WX, Zeng XT, et al.Research progress of early postoperative rehabilitation for acute Achilles tendon rupture after surgical repair[J]. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi, 2019,33(3):382-386. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807146.
[27]	Kauwe M.Acute achilles tendon rupture: clinical evaluation, conservative management, and early active rehabilitation[J]. Clin Podiatr Med Surg, 2017,34(2):229-243. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2016.10.009.