运动学对线与机械学对线对初次全膝关节置换术患者下肢对线参数的影响

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210601-00146

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (6125 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨运动学对线（KA）-全膝关节置换术（TKA）与机械学对线（MA）-TKA手术前后下肢对线影像学参数的变化,分析术后残余内翻的原因。方法回顾性队列研究。纳入2020年6月—2021年1月首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科接受TKA患者36例,其中男17例、女19例,年龄58~82岁。TKA术中采用KA技术的18例纳入KA组、采用MA技术的18例纳入MA组。比较2组患者年龄、性别比例、体质量指数（BMI）、侧别以及手术时间等基线资料,对比分析两组患者手术前后髋膝踝角（HKA）、胫骨近端内侧角（MPTA）、机械股骨远端外侧角（mLDFA）的变化以及畸形矫正程度,并对每组患者手术前后的HKA、MPTA以及mLDFA进行相关性及回归分析。结果 2组患者基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义（P值均 > 0.05）。KA组和MA组术前HKA（172.2° ± 5.3°、172.8° ± 4.6°）、mLDFA（88.9° ± 2.7°、90.4° ± 3.1°）、MPTA（84.8° ± 1.7°、84.4° ± 3.7°）,以及术后HKA（175.8° ± 2.6°、176.3° ± 2.0°）、mLDFA（89.4° ± 2.7°、90.9° ± 2.4°）比较,差异均无统计学意义（t=0.35、1.58、0.37、0.68、1.76,P值均 > 0.05）;术后MPTA测量值KA组（85.3° ± 1.8°）小于MA组（87.4° ± 2.1°）,差异有统计学意义（t=3.33,P = 0.002）。2组患者术后HKA均大于术前,且MA组术后MPTA也大于术前,差异均有统计学意义（P值均 < 0.01）。MA组MPTA矫正度数（4.3° ± 2.8°）大于KA组（1.9° ± 1.5°）,差异有统计学意义（t=-3.25,P = 0.003）。此外,KA组中术后mLDFA与术前mLDFA呈高度相关（R²=0.79,P < 0.001）。结论应用传统器械进行KA-TKA能够恢复患者术前股骨远端与胫骨近端关节线的解剖形态,术后患者胫骨近端关节线更内倾、股骨远端关节线更外翻,使得膝关节关节线与地面较MA-TKA更平行;而MA-TKA股骨假体放置更倾向于内翻。对于术后残留轻度内翻的TKA,采用KA方法与MA方法的内翻原因及程度不同,KA并不等同于残留内翻的MA。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	赵潇雄
	温亮
	王志为
	周磊
	马德思
	潘江

关键词 ：关节成形术, 置换, 膝, 运动学对线, 机械学对线, 膝内翻

Abstract：Objective This study aimed to explore the changes in lower-limb alignment imaging parameters before and after kinematic alignment(KA)-total knee replacement (TKA) and mechanical alignment(MA)-TKA, as well as to analyze the causes of postoperative residual varus. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 36 patients who underwent TKA from June 2020 to January 2021 in the Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University. The patients included 17 males and 19 females aged 58-82 years old. During TKA, 18 patients subjected to KA technique were included in the KA group, and 18 patients subjected to MA technique were included in the MA group. The baseline data of the patients including age, gender, body mass index, operative time, and lateral ratio were compared between the two groups. Hip-knee-ankle angle(HKA), medial proximal tibial angle(MPTA), medial lateral distal femoral angle(mLDFA), and the degree of correction were compared between the two groups pre- and post-operatively. Correlation and regression analyses were conducted on HKA, MPTA, and mLDFA in each group. Results No statistical significance was found in the comparison of baseline data between the two groups (all P values > 0.05). Preoperative HKA (172.2° ± 5.3° vs. 172.8° ± 4.6°), mLDFA (88.9° ± 2.7° vs. 90.4° ± 3.1°), MPTA (84.8° ± 1.7° vs. 84.4° ± 3.7°), and postoperative HKA (175.8° ± 2.6° vs. 176.3° ± 2.0°), and mLDFA (89.4° ± 2.7° vs. 90.9° ± 2.4°) in the KA and MA groups had no statistically significant difference (t=0.35, 1.58, 0.37, 0.68, 1.76, all P values > 0.05). Postoperative HKA in both groups was higher than that before surgery, and postoperative MPTA in the MA group was higher than that before surgery; the differences were statistically significant (all P values < 0.05). MPTA in the KA group was lower than that in the MA group (85.3° ± 1.8° vs. 87.4° ± 2.1°), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.33, P = 0.002). MPTA correction degree in the MA group (4.3° ± 2.8°) was higher than that in the KA group (1.9° ± 1.5°), and the difference was statistically significant (t=3.25, P = 0.003). Additionally, a high correlation existed between post- and pre-operative mLDFA in the KA group (R² = 0.79, P < 0.001). Conclusion KA-TKA with traditional instruments can restore the preoperative anatomical morphology of the joint line of the distal femur and proximal tibia. The joint line of the proximal tibia is more inclined, and the joint line of the distal femur is more evaginated, thereby making the knee joint line more parallel to the ground than MA-TKA. MA-TKA femoral prosthesis placement is more prone to varus. Therefore, for TKA with mild residual varus after surgery, the reasons for the residual varus differed between KA-TKA and MA-TKA, and KA is not MA with residual varus.

Key words： Arthroplasty replacement knee Kinematical alignment Mechanical alignment Genu varum

收稿日期: 2021-06-01

通讯作者: 温亮,Email：wenliang@ccmu.edu.cn

引用本文:

赵潇雄, 温亮, 王志为, 周磊, 马德思, 潘江. 运动学对线与机械学对线对初次全膝关节置换术患者下肢对线参数的影响[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2022, 27(3): 156-162.
Zhao Xiaoxiong, Wen Liang, Wang Zhiwei, Zhou Lei, Ma Desi, Pan Jiang. Comparative study of lower-limb alignment imaging parameters between kinematic and mechanical alignment in patients with primary total knee replacement. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2022, 27(3): 156-162.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20210601-00146 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V27/I3/156

[1]	Liu P, Liu J, Xia K, et al.Clinical outcome evaluation of primary total knee arthroplasty in patients with diabetes mellitus[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017,23:2198-2202. DOI: 10.12659/msm.901720.
[2]	Bierke S, Häner M, Karpinski K, et al.Midterm effect of mental factors on pain, function, and patient satisfaction 5 years after uncomplicated total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2020, 35(1):105-111. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.08.008.
[3]	Feng B, Ren Y, Lin J, et al.No difference in clinical outcome and survivorship after total knee arthroplasty with patellar resurfacing and nonresurfacing after minimum 10-year follow-up[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2020, 99(11):e19080. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019080.
[4]	Hauer G, Hörlesberger N, Klim S, et al.Mid-term results show no significant difference in postoperative clinical outcome, pain and range of motion between a well-established total knee arthroplasty design and its successor: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2021, 29(3):827-831. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-020-06027-z.
[5]	Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM, et al.Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2010, 468(1):57-63. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9.
[6]	Khatib Y, Xia A, Naylor JM, et al.Different targets of mechanical alignment do not improve knee outcomes after TKA[J]. Knee, 2019,26(6):1395-1402. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.004.
[7]	Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, et al.The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2012,470(1):45-53. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5.
[8]	Howell SM, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, et al.Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?[J]. Int Orthop, 2015,39(11):2117-2124. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2743-5.
[9]	Blakeney W, Clément J, Desmeules F, et al.Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019,27(5):1410-1417. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1.
[10]	Young SW, Sullivan N, Walker ML, et al.No Difference in 5-year clinical or radiographic outcomes between kinematic and mechanical alignment in TKA: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2020, 478(6):1271-1279. DOI: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001150.
[11]	Koh IJ, Lin CC, Patel NA, et al.Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty reproduces more native rollback and laxity than mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty: a matched pair cadaveric study[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2019, 105(4):605-611. DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.03.011.
[12]	Dossett HG, Swartz GJ, Estrada NA, et al.Kinematically versus mechanically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2012, 35(2): e160-e169. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20120123-04.
[13]	Shelton TJ, Gill M, Athwal G, et al.Outcomes in patients with a calipered kinematically aligned TKA that already had a contralateral mechanically aligned TKA[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021, 34(1):87-93. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1693000.
[14]	王志为, 温亮, 宋大勇, 等. 运动学对线全膝关节置换股骨滑车截骨面解剖适配与下肢对线参数的相关性研究[J].中华解剖与临床杂志, 2021, 26(2): 155-161. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200902-00290.Wang ZW, Wen L, Song DY, et al.Correlation study between anatomical matching of trochlear resection and alignment parameters of lower extremities in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chin J Anat Clin, 2021, 26(2):155-161. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200902-00290.
[15]	Howell SM, Kuznik K, Hull ML, et al.Results of an initial experience with custom-fit positioning total knee arthroplasty in a series of 48 patients[J]. Orthopedics, 2008,31(9): 857-863. DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20080901-15.
[16]	Dossett HG, Estrada NA, Swartz GJ, et al. A randomised controlled trial of kinematically and mechanically aligned total knee replacements: two-year clinical results[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(7):907-913. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.96B7.32812.
[17]	Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML.Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018,33(12):3678-3684. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.020.
[18]	Niki Y, Kobayashi S, Nagura T, et al.Joint line modification in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty improves functional activity but not patient satisfaction[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018,33(7):2125-2130. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.015.
[19]	王志为, 温亮, 于洋, 等. 个性化截骨工具辅助下运动学对线全膝关节置换的早期临床结果[J].中华外科杂志, 2020, 58(6): 457-463. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200103-00007.Wang ZW, Wen L, Yu Y, et al.Early clinical effects of total knee arthroplasty with kinematic alignment assisted by patient-specific instrumentation[J]. Chin J Surg, 2020,58(6): 457-463. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20200103-00007.
[20]	Nedopil AJ, Singh AK, Howell SM, et al.Does calipered kinematically aligned TKA restore native left to right symmetry of the lower limb and improve function?[J]. J Arthroplasty, 2018,33(2):398-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.09.039.
[21]	Nedopil AJ, Howell SM, Hull ML.Deviations in femoral joint lines using calipered kinematically aligned TKA from virtually planned joint lines are small and do not affect clinical outcomes[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2020, 28(10):3118-3127. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05776-w.