腘动脉与后膝关节囊间隙联合隐神经阻滞及“鸡尾酒”疗法在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果观察

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20211028-00306

摘要
图/表
参考文献(21)
相关文章 (15)

全文: PDF (971 KB) HTML (1 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨超声引导下腘动脉与后膝关节囊间隙（IPACK）联合隐神经阻滞及“鸡尾酒”疗法在老年患者全膝关节置换术（TKA）中的应用效果。方法前瞻性随机对照研究。纳入2020年10月—2021年9月蚌埠医学院第一附属医院60例择期行单侧TKA的老年患者,其中男19例、女41例,年龄60~85（69.0±6.1）岁。按照数字表法将患者随机分为3组,每组20例：IPACK联合隐神经阻滞及“鸡尾酒”疗法为A组,坐骨神经联合股神经及股外侧皮神经阻滞组为B组,单纯全身麻醉为对照组。观测指标：（1）比较患者年龄、性别、体质量指数、麻醉前生命体征（平均动脉压、心率、外科容积指数）等基线资料;（2）比较患者术中的生命体征变化;（3）比较患者术前和术后24 h炎性因子白细胞介素（IL）-1β、C反应蛋白（CRP）浓度;（4）比较患者术后6、12、24和48 h运动及静息数字评价量表（NRS）疼痛评分;（5）比较患者术后首次自主下床活动时间、术后住院时间,以及术后12、24和48 h膝关节活动度;（6）比较患者术后一般临床情况（苏醒时间、拔管时间、瑞芬太尼用量）、镇痛泵按压次数、镇痛的补救率及相关不良反应（恶心呕吐、嗜睡、心动过缓）的发生情况。结果（1）3组患者的基线资料比较差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。（2）术中切皮、扩髓及手术结束时,A、B组的平均动脉压、心率、外科容积指数均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P值均<0.05）。（3）患者术后24 h的IL-1β、CRP浓度对照组均高于A、B组（P值均<0.05）,A组与B组比较差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。（4）术后6、12、24、48 h,A、B组静息及运动NRS疼痛评分均明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P值均<0.05）。（5）术后12、24、48 h,A组患者的膝关节活动度（38.4°±8.9°、67.4°±8.2°、82.1°±8.8°）明显大于B组（29.5°±9.6°、61.3°±7.1°、72.3°±7.1°）和对照组（30.8°±6.8°、59.9°±7.6°、69.2°±7.4°）,差异均有统计学意义（F=6.27、5.45、14.73,P值均<0.05）,B组与对照之间差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）;术后住院时间和首次自主下床活动时间A组最短,为（27.0±5.8）h、（3.8±0.8）d,对照组为（39.6±6.4）h、（4.6±0.9）d,B组为（47.7±4.0）h、（5.2±0.8）d,差异均有统计学意义（F=71.33、11.71,P值均<0.001）。（6）A、B组的苏醒时间、拔管时间及瑞芬太尼用量、术后镇痛补救与不良反应均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义（P值均<0.05）;A、B组比较差异均无统计学意义（P值均>0.05）。结论老年患者TKA行IPACK联合隐神经阻滞及“鸡尾酒”疗法,术中及术后患者镇痛效果较好,住院时间短,运动功能干扰小,对TKA后老年患者的早期功能锻炼起到一定的积极作用。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	王倩
	凌云志
	孙宜云
	杨栋栋
	李芷依
	高兴悦
	谢亚琼

关键词 ：麻醉和镇痛, 腘动脉与后膝关节囊间隙阻滞, 隐神经阻滞, "鸡尾酒"疗法, 关节成形术,置换,膝

Abstract：Objective To investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) blocks combined with saphenous nerve block and "cocktail" therapy in elderly patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods This study was a prospective study. The clinical data of 60 elderly patients undergoing unilateral TKA in the First Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical College from October 2020 to September 2021 were included. There were 19 males and 41 females, aged 60-85 (69.0±6.1) years. The patients were randomly divided into three groups: group A received IPACK combined with saphenous nerve block and "cocktail" therapy, group B received sciatic nerve combined with femoral nerve and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block, and the control group received simple general anesthesia, with 20 cases in each group. Outcome measures including: (1) baseline data such as age, gender, body mass index, and vital signs before anesthesia (mean arterial pressure [MAP], heart rate, surgical pleth index [SPI]); (2) changes of vital signs; (3) expression levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) before operation and 24 h after operation; (4) Numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation; (5) patients' first time out of bed activity time after surgery, postoperative hospital stay, and knee joint activity at 12 h, 24 h, and 48 h after operation; (6) general clinical conditions (recovery time, extubation time, dosage of remifentanil), effective pressing times of analgesic pump, recovery rate of analgesia, and incidence of related adverse reactions (nausea, vomiting, drowsiness, and bradycardia) were compared. Results (1) No significant difference was observed in baseline data among the three groups (all P values >0.05). (2) The changes of vital signs in the three groups were compared the heart rate (HR), MAP, and SPI in groups A and B were lower than those in the control group (all P values <0.05). (3) The levels of IL-1β and CRP in the control group at 24 h after surgery were higher than those in groups A and B (all P values <0.05), and no statistical significance was observed between group A and group B (all P values >0.05). (4) At 6, 12, 24, and 48 h postoperatively, the resting and exercise NRS pain scores in groups A and B were significantly lower than those in the control group, with statistical significance (all P values <0.05). (5) The range of motion of the knee joint in group A (38.4°±8.9°, 67.4°±8.2°, 82.1°±8.8°) was significantly higher than that in group B (29.5°±9.6°, 61.3°±7.1°, 72.3°±7.1°) and the control group (30.8°±6.8°, 59.9°±7.6°, 69.2°±7.4°),the differences were statistically significant (F=6.27, 5.45, 14.73, all P values <0.05). No significant difference was observed between group B and the control group (all P values >0.05). The postoperative hospital stay and the first independent ambulation time were the shortest in group A [(27±5.8) h, (3.8±0.8) days], followed by the control group [(39.6±6.4) h, (4.6±0.9) days] and group B [(47.7±4.0) h, (5.2±0.8) days]. The differences were statistically significant (F=71.33, 11.71, all P values <0.001). (6) The recovery time, extubation time, and remifentanil dosage of groups A and B were lower than those of the control group (all P values <0.05). The recovery rate of postoperative analgesia and the incidence of adverse reactions in groups A and B were lower than those in the control group (all P values >0.05). Conclusion IPACK combined with saphenous nerve block and "cocktail" therapy for elderly patients undergoing TKA surgery has good analgesic effect, short hospital stay, and small interference of motor function, which plays a positive role in early functional exercise of elderly patients with TKA.

Key words： Anesthesia and analgesia interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block Saphenous nerve block "Cocktail"therapy Arthroplasty,replacement,knee

收稿日期: 2021-10-28

基金资助:安徽省高等学校自然科学重点研究项目（KJ2019A0330,KJ2021A0705）

通讯作者: 凌云志,Email： lingyunzhi770916@aliyun.com

引用本文:

王倩, 凌云志, 孙宜云, 杨栋栋, 李芷依, 高兴悦, 谢亚琼. 腘动脉与后膝关节囊间隙联合隐神经阻滞及“鸡尾酒”疗法在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果观察[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2022, 27(5): 324-330.
Wang Qian, Ling Yunzhi, Sun Yiyun, Yang Dongdong, Li Zhiyi, Gao Xingyue, Xie Yaqiong. Application of ultrasound-guided interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee blocks combined with saphenous nerve block and "cocktail" therapy in analgesia after total knee arthroplasty in elderly people. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2022, 27(5): 324-330.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20211028-00306 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2022/V27/I5/324

[1]	Hawker GA.Osteoarthritis is a serious disease[J]. Clin Exp Rheumatol, 2019, 37(Suppl 120):S3-S6.
[2]	Price AJ, Alvand A, Troelsen A, et al.Knee replacement[J]. Lancet, 2018, 392(10158):1672-1682.DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32344-4.
[3]	Koh JC, Song Y, Kim SY, et al.Postoperative pain and patient-controlled epidural analgesia-related adverse effects in young and elderly patients: a retrospective analysis of 2,435 patients[J].J Pain Res, 2017, 10: 897-904.DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S133235.
[4]	Eccles CJ, Swiergosz AM, Smith AF, et al.Decreased opioid consumption and length of stay using an IPACK and adductor canal nerve block following total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg, 2021,34(7):705-711. DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-1700840.
[5]	Kandarian BS, Elkassabany NM, Tamboli M, et al.Updates on multimodal analgesia and regional anesthesia for total knee arthroplasty patients[J]. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol, 2019, 33(1): 111-123.DOI: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.02.004.
[6]	Terkawi AS, Mavridis D, Sessler DI, et al.Pain management modalities after total knee arthroplasty: a network meta-analysis of 170 randomized controlled trials[J]. Anesthesiology, 2017,126(5):923-937. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001607.
[7]	Thobhani S, Scalercio L, Elliott CE, et al.Novel regional techniques for total knee arthroplasty promote reduced hospital length of stay: an analysis of 106 patients[J]. Ochsner J, 2017,17(3):233-238.
[8]	李敏, 陈鹭, 吴黄辉, 等. 收肌管联合IPACK阻滞用于全膝关节置换术后多模式镇痛的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2019,39(5):574-577. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2019.05.017.Li M, Chen L, Wu HH, et al.Efficacy of adductor canal combined with IPACK block for multimodal analgesia after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Chin J Anesthesiol,2019,39(5):574-577. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1416.2019.05.017.
[9]	Kim DH, Beathe JC, Lin Y, et al.Addition of infiltration between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee and adductor canal block to periarticular injection enhances postoperative pain control in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Anesth Analg, 2019,129(2):526-535. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003794.
[10]	Karcioglu O, Topacoglu H, Dikme O, et al.A systematic review of the pain scales in adults: which to use?[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2018,36(4):707-714. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.01.008.
[11]	Tran J, Peng P, Gofeld M, et al.Anatomical study of the innervation of posterior knee joint capsule: implication for image-guided intervention[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2019,44(2):234-238. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2018-000015.
[12]	Hermanns H, Werdehausen R, Hollmann MW, et al.Assessment of skin temperature during regional anaesthesia-what the anaesthesiologist should know[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2018,62(9):1280-1289. DOI: 10.1111/aas.13176.
[13]	Castorina S, Guglielmino C, Castrogiovanni P, et al.Clinical evidence of traditional vs fast track recovery methodologies after total arthroplasty for osteoarthritic knee treatment. A retrospective observational study[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2017,7(3):504-513. DOI: 10.11138/mltj/2017.7.3.504.
[14]	Fransen BL, Hoozemans M, Argelo K, et al.Fast-track total knee arthroplasty improved clinical and functional outcome in the first 7 days after surgery: a randomized controlled pilot study with 5-year follow-up[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2018,138(9):1305-1316. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-018-3001-2.
[15]	Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, Ngarmukos S, et al.Motor-sparing effect of iPACK (interspace between the popliteal artery and capsule of the posterior knee) block versus tibial nerve block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2020,45(4):267-276. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-100895.
[16]	武茜, 崔耀梅, 汤洋, 等. 超声引导下隐神经联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在全膝关节置换术后镇痛中的应用[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2021,37(5):467-470. DOI: 10.12089/jca.2021.05.004.Wu X, Cui YM, Tang Y, et al.Application of ultrasound-guided saphenous nerve block combined with interspace between the pop- liteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee block in analgesia after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology, 2021,37(5):467-470. DOI: 10.12089/jca.2021.05.004.
[17]	Tammachote N, Kanitnate S, Manuwong S, et al.Periarticular multimodal drug injection is better than single anesthetic drug in controlling pain after total knee arthroplasty[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2018,28(4):667-675. DOI: 10.1007/s00590-017-2110-x.
[18]	Ryu KH, Kim JA, Ko DC, et al.Desflurane reduces intraoperative remifentanil requirements more than sevoflurane: comparison using surgical pleth index-guided analgesia[J]. Br J Anaesth, 2018,121(5):1115-1122. DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.05.064.
[19]	Vichainarong C, Kampitak W, Tanavalee A, et al.Analgesic efficacy of infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (iPACK) block added to local infiltration analgesia and continuous adductor canal block after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2020,45(11):872-879. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2020-101396.
[20]	Deng QF, Gu HY, Peng WY, et al.Impact of enhanced recovery after surgery on postoperative recovery after joint arthroplasty: results from a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Postgrad Med J, 2018,94(1118):678-693. DOI: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136166.
[21]	Layera S, Aliste J, Bravo D, et al.Motor-sparing nerve blocks for total knee replacement: a scoping review[J]. Clin Anesth. 2021, 68: 110076. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110076.