人体腕骨显微骨硬度分布特征的研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20190902-00275

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (8)

全文: PDF (2228 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨人体腕骨显微骨硬度的分布特征及其临床意义。方法纳入3具新鲜冰冻成人尸体标本(62岁男性、58岁男性、45岁女性),将右侧腕骨软组织剥离后,用慢速锯分别在舟骨、月骨、头状骨、钩骨、大多角骨和小多角骨切取厚3 mm的骨组织标本。舟骨选取舟骨结节、腰部内外侧和舟骨体部,月骨选取腕关节面、掌侧面、背侧面和远端,头状骨、钩骨、大多角骨和小多角骨选取外层皮质不同区域,应用德国KB-5型显微维氏硬度仪测试标本不同区域的硬度值,采用50 gf力加载50 s、维持12 s的标准操作方法进行硬度值测定,每个区域选取 5 个有效值,全体有效值的平均值作为该部位的骨硬度值。观察不同骨骼间及骨骼内部不同区域的骨硬度值差异。结果 3具标本中共取得舟骨、月骨、头状骨、钩骨、大多角骨和小多角骨标本切片18片,测量位点255个。腕骨不同骨骼骨硬度从高到低依次为钩状骨(39.04±5.79)HV、头状骨(38.98±6.17)HV、舟骨(37.72±5.85)HV、大多角骨(35.89±4.75)HV、月骨(33.65±5.42)HV及小多角骨(31.82±5.54)HV,不同骨骼间总体骨硬度差异有统计学意义(F=10.783,P＜0.01)。舟骨、月骨内部不同区域骨硬度分布近似,舟骨结节、腰部外侧、腰部内侧和舟骨体部骨硬度分别为(37.07±5.77)、(37.51±6.39)、(40.00±5.64)、(36.31±5.47)HV,其中腰部内侧骨硬度最大,舟骨体部骨硬度最小,4部位间骨硬度比较差异无统计学意义(F=1.129,P＞0.05)。月骨腕关节面、掌侧面、背侧面和远端骨硬度分别为(33.57±3.61)、(34.58±6.04)、(35.47±5.24)、(30.97±5.88)HV,其中背侧骨硬度最大,远端骨硬度最小, 4个部位间骨硬度比较差异无统计学意义(F=2.040,P＞0.05)。结论健康人腕骨不同骨骼间硬度各有不同,舟骨和月骨内部各部位骨硬度分布均匀一致。测量腕骨显微骨硬度值,了解其分布特征,有助于了解腕骨微观生物力学性能,亦可指导腕骨骨折内固定方法的选择,设计制作更加符合人体生理状态下的腕部骨骼假体及建立腕部肌骨组织的有限元模型。临床试验注册中国临床试验注册中心,注册号为ChiCTR-BPR-17010818。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	殷兵
	李升
	郭家良
	王建朝
	张英泽

关键词 ：腕骨, 维氏硬度, 显微硬度, 舟骨, 月骨, 头状骨, 钩骨, 大多角骨, 小多角骨

Abstract：Objective To explore the distribution and significance of microhardness of human carpal bones.Methods Three fresh frozen bodies with age > 40 years old, good health and no chronic history were selected and right limbs were used. These carpal bones (navicular bone, lunate bone, capitate bone, hamate bone, trapezium and trapezoid bone) were cut into 3 mm thick slices with a low-speed saw. A microindenter tted with a Vickers indenter point was used to measure the Vickers hardness in the cortical region in the bone slices of navicular bone, lunate bone, capitate bone, hamate bone, trapezium and trapezoid bone. In this series of studies, the standard operating method of 50 gf force loading 50 s and maintaining 12 s was used to determine the hardness values. Five effective region values were selected in the same area, and the average value of all the effective values was taken as the hardness value of the part. Vickers hardness values of different regions were recorded and analyzed.Results Totally, 18 specimens and 255 indentations at different bones and anatomic sites were involved in our result. Among all carpal bones, the hamate bone (39.04±5.79) HV represented the largest hardness, followed by the capitate bone (38.98±6.17) HV, scaphoid bone (37.72±5.85) HV, trapezium bone (35.89±4.75) HV, lunate bone (33.65±5.42) HV and trapezoid bone (31.82±5.54) HV. There were statistically significant differences in hardness among different bones (F=10.783, P<0.01).The highest hardness value existed in the medial of scaphoid waist (40.00 HV) and the lowest hardness existed in the scaphoid body (36.31 HV). The tubercle of scaphoid bone, medial and lateral of scaphoid waist and scaphoid body were measured and analyzed. No significant differences were found among the four sites(F=1.129, P>0.05). The Vickers hardness were similar in the metacarpal site, metacarpal, dorsal and distal site of the lunate bone(F=2.040, P＞0.05).Conclusions Vickers hardness in different bones of healthy person wrist bones are different, whereas the hardness distribution of all parts of scaphoid and lunate bone is consistent. Measuring the microhardness value of wrist bone and understanding its distribution characteristics can help to understand the microbiomechanical properties of wrist bone, and also guide the selection of internal fixation methods for wrist bone fracture, so as to design and make wrist bone prosthesis more in line with human physiology and establish the finite element model of wrist muscule-bone tissue. Trial Registation Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR-TNC-17010818.

Key words： Carpal bones Vickers hardness Microhardness Navicular bone Lunate bone Capitate bone Hamate bone Trapezium bone Trapezoid bone

收稿日期: 2019-09-02

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(8157125、81501934)

通讯作者: 张英泽,Email:yzling_liu@163.com

引用本文:

殷兵, 李升, 郭家良, 王建朝, 张英泽. 人体腕骨显微骨硬度分布特征的研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2020, 25(2): 93-97.
Yin Bing, Li Sheng, Guo Jialiang, Wang Jiangzhao, Zhang Yingze. Distribution of human carpal bone microhardness. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2020, 25(2): 93-97.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20190902-00275 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V25/I2/93

[1]	王凯, 巨积辉, 金光哲, 等. 背侧支撑钢板治疗第四、五腕掌关节骨折脱位[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2019, 35(1): 1-3. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.01.001.Wang K, Ju JH, Jin GZ, et al. Application of dorsal supporting plate for treatment of the fourth and fifth carpometacarpal joint fractures and dislocations[J]. Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery, 2019, 35(1): 1-3. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.01.001.
[2]	杨焕友, 王伟, 张荐, 等. 空心螺钉治疗尺骨茎突基底部骨折[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2019, 35(2): 87-89. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.02.003.Yang HY, Wang W, Zhang J, et al. Cannulated screw internal fixation for the treatment of ulnar styloid base fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Hand Surgery, 2019, 35(2): 87-89. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.02.003.
[3]	张浩, 朱建民, 马南, 等. 腕关节有限元骨性建模及力学分析[J]. 江苏大学学报(医学版), 2013, 23(1): 53-56.Zhang H, Zhu JM, Ma N, et al. Biomechanical analysis of human wrist joint by constructing a three-dimensional finite element model[J]. Journal of Jiangsu University(Medicine Edition) 2013, 23(1): 53-56.
[4]	郭欣. 腕部的三维有限元模拟及腕管综合征的生物力学研究[D]. 成都: 四川大学, 2007.Guo X. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of wrist and biomechanical studies on carpal tunnel syndrome[D]. Chendu: Sichuan University, 2007.
[5]	Zwierzak I, Baleani M, Viceconti M. Microindentation on cortical human bone: effects of tissue condition and indentation location on hardness values[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2009, 223(7): 913-918. DOI:10.1243/09544119JEIM634.
[6]	Ohman C, Zwierzak I, Baleani M, et al. Human bone hardness seems to depend on tissue type but not on anatomical site in the long bones of an old subject[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2013, 227(2): 200-206. DOI:10.1177/0954411912459424.
[7]	Eckstein F, Wunderer C, Boehm H, et al. Reproducibility and side differences of mechanical tests for determining the structural strength of the proximal femur[J]. J Bone Miner Res, 2004, 19(3): 379-385. DOI:10.1359/JBMR.0301247.
[8]	Johnson WM, Rapoff AJ. Microindentation in bone: hardness variation with five independent variables[J]. J Mater Sci Mater Med, 2007, 18(4): 591-597. DOI:10.1007/s10856-007-2306-4.
[9]	ASTM E384-16, Standard test method for microindentation hardness of materials[s]. West C onshohecken: American Society for Testing of Materials (ASTM), 2017. DOI:10.1520/e0384-17.
[10]	Hodgskinson R, Currey JD, Evans GP. Hardness, an indicator of the mechanical competence of cancellous bone[J]. J Orthop Res, 1989, 7(5): 754-758. DOI:10.1002/jor.1100070518.
[11]	殷兵, 王建朝, 李升, 等. 人体跖骨显微硬度的分布特征研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2018, 23(6): 465-468. DOI:10.3760 / cma. j. issn. 2095-7041. 2018. 06. 001.Yin B, Wang JZ, Li S, et al. The micro-hardness distribution in human metatarsal bones[J]. Chin J of Anat Clin, 2018, 23(6): 465-468. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041. 2018. 06. 001.
[12]	Zysset PK. Indentation of bone tissue: a short review[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2009, 20(6): 1049-1055. DOI:10.1007/s00198-009-0854-9.
[13]	Boivin G, Farlay D, Bala Y, et al. Influence of remodeling on the mineralization of bone tissue[J]. Osteoporos Int, 2009, 20(6): 1023-1026. DOI:10.1007/s00198-009-0861-x.
[14]	Evans GP, Behiri JC, Currey JD, et al. Microhardness and Young's modulus in cortical bone exhibiting a wide range of mineral volume fractions, and in a bone analogue[J]. Journal of Materials Science Materials in Medicine, 1990, 1(1): 38-43. DOI:10.1007/BF00705352.
[15]	Weaver JK. The microscopic hardness of bone[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1966, 48(2): 273-288.
[16]	刘忠厚. 骨内科学[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2015: 2-3.Liu ZH. Osteopathic Internal Medicine[M]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, 2015: 2-3.
[17]	刘雯雯, 侯建华, 王志, 等. 应力对骨折愈合的影响研究[J]. 河南科技, 2014(7): 59-60.
[18]	曲华, 吴文周, 赵永红. 骨应力与生长关系的细观机制[J]. 太原理工大学学报, 2003, 34(5): 509-512, 528. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9432.2003.05.001. Qu H, Wu WZ, Zhao YH, et al. Biomechanical mechanism of stress and grtowth of bone cells[J]. Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology, 2003, 34(5): 509-512, 528. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-9432.2003.05.001.
[19]	刘磊, 杨宗酉, 孙家元, 等. 2003年至2012年河北医科大学第三医院成人足舟骨骨折的流行病学研究[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2014, 16(6): 508-511. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2014.06.011. Liu L, Yang ZY, Sun JY, et al. Epidemiological analysis of tarsal navicular fractures in adults in the Third Affiliated Hospital to Hebei Medical University from 2003 through 2012[J]. Chin J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 16(6): 508-511. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2014.06.011.
[20]	张浩, 马南, 朱建民. 腕关节有限元模型的建立及应用进展[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2012(52): 9813-9817. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2012.52.024.Zhang H, Ma N, Zhu JM. Construction and application of wrist finite element model[J]. Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research, 2012(52): 9813-9817. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2012.52.024.
[21]	朱海波, 朱建民, 马南, 等. 基于软骨和韧带的全腕关节有限元模型建立和舟状骨生物力学研究[J]. 上海医学, 2014, 37(7): 602-605. Zhu HB, Zhu JM, Ma N, et al. Scaphoid biomechanical study based on finite element analysis of human wrist joint including cartilage and ligament[J]. Shanghai Medical Journal, 2014, 37(7): 602-605.
[22]	钦斌, 黄永火, 欧阳羽,等. 轴向应力作用下的舟骨有限元分析[J]. 第三军医大学学报, 2010, 32(11): 1213-1215.Qin B, Huang YH, Ouyang Y, et al. Finite element analysis in scaphoid bone under action of axial stress[J]. Journal of Third Military Medical University, 2010, 32(11): 1213-1215.