人体耻骨上、下支显微骨硬度分布特征研究

doi:10.3760/cma.j.cn101201-20190612-00192

摘要
图/表
参考文献
相关文章 (12)

全文: PDF (2072 KB) HTML (2 KB)
输出: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)

摘要目的探讨人体耻骨上、下支显微硬度的分布特征。方法由河北医科大学解剖教研室提供3具新鲜冰冻成人尸体标本(标本A为62岁男性、B为45岁女性、C为58岁男性),取出耻骨支并剔除附着之软组织。使用微型台锯及高精慢速锯将耻骨上、下支各分成3等份,每份进行均分切割,将骨骼制成厚3 mm的骨组织切片,固定在载玻片上并进行标记。依次用800、1 000、1 200、2 000、4 000目碳化硅粒砂纸打磨标本。应用德国KB-5型显微维氏硬度仪测试标本不同区域的硬度值,采用50 gf力加载50 s、维持12 s的标准操作方法进行硬度值测定,每一个区域选取5个有效显微硬度值,全体有效值的平均值为该区域的硬度值。结果 A、B、C 3具标本耻骨上支骨硬度值分别为(27.99±6.03)HV、(29.93±4.86)HV、(33.42±5.15)HV, 耻骨下支骨硬度值分别为(33.99±3.10)HV、(37.95±5.39)HV、(36.19±3.87)HV,3组数据比较差异均有统计学意义(F_上支=9.540、F_下支=12.890, P值均＜0.01)。3具标本耻骨下支骨硬度值均高于上支,差异均有统计学意义(t_A=3.432、t_B=4.280、t_C=3.874, P值均＜0.01)。结论人体耻骨下支显微骨硬度高于耻骨上支。这一耻骨显微骨硬度分布特征的首次发现,可辅助阐释耻骨支骨折的损伤机制,为研发符合该部位骨硬度特点的内固定物,及相关生物力学研究提供数据支持。临床试验注册中国临床试验注册中心,注册号为ChiCTR-TNC-17010818。

	服务

	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入我的书架
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章
	刘国彬
	殷兵
	王建朝
	李升
	张晓娟
	吴卫卫
	胡祖圣
	刘雅克
	张英泽

关键词 ：耻骨, 耻骨支, 维氏骨硬度, 显微骨硬度, 生物力学

Abstract：Objective To investigate the distribution characteristics of micro-vickers hardness (HV) in the pubic ramus.Methods Three fresh frozen adult cadavers were provided by the Department of Anatomy of Hebei Medical University. Specimen A, B, C were a 62-year-old male, a 45-year-old female and a 58-year-old male, respectively. Pubic ramus were taken out and soft tissue was removed. Micro-table saw and high-precision slow-speed saw were used to cut the specimens. Each one of the superior and inferior ramus of pubic were divided into 3 equal parts,each of which was equally cut. The bone was made into bone tissue sections 3 mm thick, which were fixed on slides and marked. The samples were sanded with silica carbide particles of 800, 1 000, 1 200, 2 000 and 4 000 mesh respectively. The hardness values of pubic ramus in different regions were tested by German KB-5 microhardness tester. In this series of studies, the standard operating method of 50 gf force loading 50 s and maintaining 12 s was used to determine the hardness values. Five effective microhardness values were selected for each region, and the average value of all effective values was used to be the hardness value of the region.Results The average bone hardness of superior and inferior ramus of pubic were (27.99±6.03)HV, (29.93±4.86) HV, (33.42±5.15)HV, and (33.99±3.10) HV, (37.95±5.39) HV, (36.19±3.87) HV, respectively. The One-way Anova analysis showed the significant difference of superior and inferior ramus of pubic among 3 groups(F_sr=9.540, F_ir=12.890, all P values＜0.01). The bone hardness of the inferior ramus of the pubis was higher than that of the superior ramus, and the difference was statistically significant (t_A=3.432, t_B=4.280, t_C=3.874, all P values＜0.01) for the three groups.Conclusions The microhardness of the inferior ramus of the pubis is higher than that of the superior ramus of the pubis. This is the first discovery of the distribution characteristics of microscopic bone hardness of the pubic bone,which can help to explain the injury mechanism of the pubic branch fracture, and provide data support for the development of internal fixation that conforms to the characteristics of bone hardness of the site and related biomechanical research. Trial Registation Chinese Clinical Trail Registry, ChiCTR-TNC-17010818.

Key words： Pubic bone Pubic ramus Vickers hardness of bone Microhardness of bone Biomechanics

收稿日期: 2019-06-12

基金资助:国家自然科学基金(81572125、81501934)

通讯作者: 张英泽,Email: yzling_liu@163.com

引用本文:

刘国彬, 殷兵, 王建朝, 李升, 张晓娟, 吴卫卫, 胡祖圣, 刘雅克, 张英泽. 人体耻骨上、下支显微骨硬度分布特征研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2020, 25(2): 98-101.
Liu Guobin, Yin Bing, Wang Jianzhao, Li Sheng, Zhang Xiaojuan, Wu Weiwei, Hu Zusheng, Liu Yake, Zhang Yingze. Research on human bone microhardness distribution characteristics of superior and inferior ramus of the pubis. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2020, 25(2): 98-101.

链接本文:

http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/10.3760/cma.j.cn101201-20190612-00192 或 http://www.cjac.com.cn/CN/Y2020/V25/I2/98

[1]	Hill RM, Robinson CM, Keating JF. Fractures of the pubic rami. Epidemiology and five-year survival[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2001, 83(8): 1141-1144. DOI:10.1302/0301-620x.83b8.11709.
[2]	殷兵, 胡祖圣, 李升, 等. 人体骨骼显微硬度研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报. 2016, 37(12): 1472-1474. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2016.12.028.
[3]	胡祖圣, 李升, 刘国彬, 等. 人体骨骼显微硬度及其相关因素初步研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2016, 37(1): 102-104. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2016.01.032.
[4]	殷兵, 王建朝, 李升, 等. 人体跖骨显微硬度的分布特征研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2018, 23(6): 465-468. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2018.06.002.Yin B, Wang JC, Li S, et al. The micro-hardness distribution in human metatarsal bones[J]. Chin J Anat Clin, 2018, 23(6): 465-468. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2018.06.002.
[5]	殷兵, 郭家良, 李升, 等. 人体距骨显微硬度的分布特征研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2018, 23(6): 461-464. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2018.06.001.Yin B, Guo JL, Li S, et al. The micro-hardness distribution in human talus bone[J]. Chin J Anat Clin, 2018, 23(6): 461-464. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2018.06.001.
[6]	李升, 张晓娟, 吴卫卫, 等. 人体脊柱胸腰段椎骨显微骨硬度分布特征研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(4): 313-317. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.04.001.Li S, Zhang XJ, Wu WW, et al. The hardness variations and characteristics of the human thoracolumbar segments by Vickers microindentation[J]. Chin J Anat Clin, 2019, 24(4): 313-317. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.04.001.
[7]	张晓娟, 李升, 吴卫卫, 等. 人体肱骨干显微骨硬度分布特征的实验研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(4): 318-321. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.04.002.Zhang XJ, Li S, Wu WW, et al. Micro-hardness distribution of humeral shaft in human skeleton[J]. Chin J Anat Clin, 2019, 24(4): 318-321. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-7041.2019.04.002.
[8]	Zwierzak I, Baleani M, Viceconti M. Microindentation on cortical human bone: effects of tissue condition and indentation location on hardness values[J]. Proc Inst Mech Eng H, 2009, 223(7): 913-918. DOI:10.1243/09544119JEIM634.
[9]	赵勇, 孙涛, 邹德鑫, 等. 骨盆后环内固定的生物力学研究进展[J]. 中国骨与关节外科, 2014, (1): 77-80. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1674-1439.2013.10-018.
[10]	陈同林, 白洪涛, 谢洪峰, 等. 微创骶髂三角固定治疗垂直不稳定型骨盆后环损伤[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2017, 19(8): 669-674. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2017.08.005.Chen TL, Bai HT, Xie HF, et al. Minimally invasive fixation of sacroiliac triangle for vertically unstable pelvic posterior ring injury[J]. Chin J Orthop Trauma, 2017, 19(8): 669-674. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2017.08.005.
[11]	孟欢, 林光湖, 陈滨. 经髂骨内固定器治疗骨盆后环骨折的研究进展[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2018, 20(1): 85-88. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2018.01.016.Meng H, Lin GH, Chen B. Research progress in treatment of dorsal pelvic ring injury by transiliac internal fixator ( TIFI )[J]. Chin J Orthop Trauma, 2018, 20(1): 85-88. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2018.01.016.
[12]	雷舟杰, 栾海, 李振. 易漏误诊耻骨下支应力性骨折2例[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2018, 2(13): 115-116. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2018.13.074.
[13]	Tile M. Pelvic ring fractures: should they be fixed?[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1988, 70(1): 1-12.
[14]	Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, Schwartz MC, et al. Pubic rami fracture: a benign pelvic injury?[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1997, 11(1): 7-9. DOI:10.1097/00005131-199701000-00003.
[15]	Matta JM. Indications for anterior fixation of pelvic fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1996 (329): 88-96. DOI:10.1097/00003086-199608000-00011.
[16]	Steinitz D, Guy P, Passariello A, et al. All superior pubic ramus fractures are not created equal[J]. Can J Surg, 2004, 47(6): 422-425.
[17]	唐明杰, 周祖彬, 于晓巍, 等. 骨盆前环骨折的微创钢板固定有限元分析及临床研究[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2013, 29(11): 1074-1078. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2013.11.012.Tang MJ, Zhou ZB, Yu XW, et al. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for anterior pelvic ring fractures: a finite element analysis and clinical study[J]. Chinese Journal of Trauma , 2013, 29(11): 1074-1078. DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-8050.2013.11.012.
[18]	Courtney PM, Taylor R, Scolaro J, et al. Displaced inferior ramus fractures as a marker of posterior pelvic injury[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(7): 935-939. DOI:10.1007/s00402-014-1993-9.
[19]	Starr AJ, Nakatani T, Reinert CM, et al. Superior pubic ramus fractures fixed with percutaneous screws: what predicts fixation failure?[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2008, 22(2): 81-87. DOI:10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162ab6e.
[20]	孟昊业, 汪爱媛, 许文静, 等. 逆行螺钉置入固定骨盆耻骨上支骨折的数字解剖学参数[J]. 解放军医学院学报, 2018, 39(6): 520-522,550. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.06.016.Meng HY, Wang AY, Xu WJ, et al. Digital anatomical parameters of retrograde screw placement for superior pubic ramus fractures[J]. Acad J Chin PLA Med Sch, 2018, 39(6): 520-522, 550. DOI:10.3969/j.issn.2095-5227.2018.06.016.
[21]	Routt ML Jr, Simonian PT, Grujic L. The retrograde medullary superior pubic ramus screw for the treatment of anterior pelvic ring disruptions: a new technique[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1995, 9(1): 35-44. DOI:10.1097/00005131-199502000-00006.