Abstract：Objective To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with sodium hyaluronate injection on knee osteoarthritis(KOA).Methods Prospective study of 240 patients with knee osteoarthritis from June 2015 to June 2017 in Department of Orthopedics, Shandong Provincial Third Hospital. The 240 patients were randomly assigned to group A (n=80), group B (n=80), group C (n=80). Group A was treated with sodium hyaluronate injection, group B was treated with extracorporeal shock wave therapy, while the group C was given extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with sodium hyaluronate injection on knee osteoarthritis. They were evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS), the Lequesne index score and Western Ontario and McMaster College(WOMAC) osteoarthritis index before the intervention and at the 1st, 3rd, 5th week after the intervention.Results All patient’s VAS, Lequesne Index score and WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index were decrease in turn at the 1st, 3rd and 5th week after treatment, and were all lower than that before treatment by paired t test (all P values <0.05). All observed indexes were compared with the three groups at the same time point, and the differences were statistically significant (all P values <0.05). In group C, the VAS score before treatment was (8.59±0.98)points, the Lequesne index score was (10.55±2.15)points, and the WOMAC osteoarthritis index score was (35.58±10.13)points. The score of VAS was (5.51±0.63)points, (3.39±0.51)points, (1.57±0.12)points at the 1st, 3rd and 5th weeks after the treatment respectively. The score of Lequesne index was (8.13±2.15)points, (7.01±2.03)points, (5.05±2.11)points, while the WOMAC index score of bone and osteoarthritis was (28.45±9.48)points, (20.38±8.64)points, (14.85±5.45)points respectively. Statistically, group C was significantly better than group A and group B (all P values＜0.05).Conclusionse Synergistic action exits between the extracorporeal shock wave therapy and the sodium hyaluronate injection on KOA. It can further relieve the pain furthermore. This combined therapy is worth popularizing and applying in clinic.
苏文珍, 林永杰, 王国伟, 耿震. 体外冲击波联合玻璃酸钠注射治疗膝关节骨关节炎的疗效观察[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2018, 23(5): 418-421.
Su Wenzhen, Lin Yongjie, Wang Guowei, Geng Zhen. Therapeutic efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with sodium hyaluronate injection on knee osteoarthritis. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2018, 23(5): 418-421.
Zhou Y, Chen J, Yang G. Serum and synovial fluid levels of CCL18 are correlated with radiographic grading of knee osteoarthritis[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2015, 21: 840-844. DOI:10.12659/MSM.892409.
Leal C, Ramon S, Furia J, et al. Current concepts of shockwave therapy in chronic patellar tendinopathy[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 24(Pt B): 160-164. DOI:10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.09.066.
[5]
Waugh CM, Morrissey D, Jones E, et al. In vivo biological response to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in human tendinopathy[J]. Eur Cell Mater, 2015, 29: 268-280. DOI:10.22203/eCM.
[6]
Katz JN, Brophy RH, Chaisson CE, et al. Surgery versus physical therapy for a meniscal tear and osteoarthritis[J]. N Engl J Med, 2013, 368(18): 1675-1684. DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1301408.
[7]
D'souza N, Rossignoli F, Golinelli G, et al. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells as a delivery platform in cell and gene therapies[J]. BMC Med, 2015, 13: 186. DOI:10.1186/s12916-015-0426-0.
[8]
Bolten WW, Glade MJ, Raum S, et al. The safety and efficacy of an enzyme combination in managing knee osteoarthritis pain in adults: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial[J]. Arthritis, 2015, 2015: 251521. DOI:10.1155/2015/251521.
Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE. Osteoarthritis: is OA a mechanical or systemic disease?[J]. Nat Rev Rheumatol, 2014, 10(9): 515-516. DOI:10.1038/nrrheum.2014.114.
Bannuru RR, Flavin NE, Vaysbrot E, et al. High-energy extracorporeal shock-wave therapy for treating chronic calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a systematic review[J]. Ann Intern Med, 2014, 160(8): 542-549. DOI:10.7326/M13-1982.
[15]
Chamberlain GA, Colborne GR. A review of the cellular and molecular effects of extracorporeal shockwave therapy[J]. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol, 2016, 29(2): 99-107. DOI:10.3415/VCOT-15-04-0057.
[16]
Ioppolo F, Tattoli M, Di Sante L, et al. Clinical improvement and resorption of calcifications in calcific tendinitis of the shoulder after shock wave therapy at 6 months follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2013, 94(9): 1699-1706. DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.030.
[17]
Verstraelen FU, In den Kleef NJ, Jansen L, et al. High-energy versus low-energy extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcifying tendinitis of the shoulder: which is superior? A meta-analysis[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2014, 472(9): 2816-2825. DOI:10.1007/s11999-014-3680-0.
[18]
Ochiai N, Ohtori S, Sasho T, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy improves motor dysfunction and pain originating from knee osteoarthritis in rats[J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2007, 15(9): 1093-1096. DOI:10.1016/j.joca.2007.03.011.
[19]
Frisbie DD, Kawcak CE, Mcllwraith CW. Evaluation of the effect of extracorporeal shock wave treatment on experimentally induced osteoarthritis in middle carpal joints of horses[J]. Am J Vet Res, 2009, 70(4): 449-454. DOI:10.2460/ajvr.70.4.449.
2018, Vol. 23 
