Abstract：Objective To explore the lateralization difference of cerebral cortex thickness in adult cerebral cortex.Methods A prospective study was conducted. From September 2017 to December 2018, 360 healthy right-handed Han volunteers aged from 21 to 80 were recruited in CT Magnetic Resonance Room of Shouguang People's Hospital. They were divided into three age groups: the young group (21-40 years old), the middle-aged group (41-60 years old) and the old group (61-80 years old). Raw brain 3.0 T MRI data were obtained and analyzed by FreeSurfer brain imaging software. The cortex thickness of the gyrus of interest in each gyrus of the left and right hemispheres was obtained. The cortical thickness of left and right cerebral hemispheres in different age groups was observed. Observe whether there was laterality in cortex thickness of each gyrus among different age groups, calculate asymmetry index for brain areas with laterality, and count the number and degree of brain areas with laterality.Results In the young group, the cortical thickness of the whole brain and left and right hemispheres were (2.506±0.027)mm, (2.508±0.015)mm and(2.504±0.015)mm, respectively. In the middle-aged group, they were(2.372±0.012)mm, (2.372±0.007)mm and (2.373±0.008)mm, respectively. In the old group, they were(2.264±0.021)mm,(2.264±0.015)mm and(2.263±0.014)mm, respectively. In the same age group, there was no significant difference in cortical thickness between left and right hemispheres (all P values＞0.05). In different age groups, the cortical thickness of the whole brain and left and right cerebral hemispheres decreased with the increase of age, and the difference was statistically significant (F=64.907, 34.843, 34.863, all P values＜0.01). The laterality and lateralization index of cerebral cortex thickness were different in young, middle-aged and old groups. In the three groups, the lateralization area was retained(such as lateral occipital gyrus, lingual gyrus, posterior cingulate gyrus, entorhinal cortex, etc), increased (such as trigone of inferior frontal gyrus, anterior central gyrus, inferior temporal gyrus, temporal pole, etc)and decreased(such as superior frontal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, middle orbital frontal gyrus, cuneiform leaf, anterior cingulate gyrus, etc). The number of lateralized brain areas in the middle-aged group was more than that in the young group and the old group, showing an inverted “U” pattern. The cortical thickness of some brain regions was laterally distributed in three age groups, but the degree of laterality was different. The lateral occipital gyrus and lingual gyrus showed a “large-small-large” pattern, while the posterior cingulate gyrus and entorhinal cortex showed a “small-large-small” pattern.Conclusions The thickness of the left and right hemispheres of the brain is asymmetric. The laterality and degree of the thickness of the cerebral cortex show different patterns with the change of age. It provides a new perspective for cognition of neurobehavioral and neurophysiological diseases.
夏新建, 孙杉杉, 王辉, 李登平, 刘晓璇, 秦禹, 孙雪. 不同年龄段成人大脑皮质厚度偏侧性的MRI研究[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2019, 24(6): 525-530.
Xia Xinjian, Sun Shanshan, Wang Hui, Li Dengping, Liu Xiaoxuan, Qin Yu, Sun Xue. MRI study on asymmetry of cortical thickness in adult cerebral cortex. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2019, 24(6): 525-530.
Kong XZ, Mathias SR, Guadalupe T, et al. Mapping cortical brain asymmetry in 17, 141 healthy individuals worldwide via the ENIGMA Consortium[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018, 115(22): E5154-E5163. DOI:10.1073/pnas.1718418115.
[2]
Riccelli R, Toschi N, Nigro S, et al. Surface-based morphometry reveals the neuroanatomical basis of the five-factor model of personality[J]. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci, 2017, 12(4): 671-684. DOI:10.1093/scan/nsw175.
[3]
Luders E, Narr KL, Thompson PM, et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in cortical thickness[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2006, 16(8): 1232-1238. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj064.
[4]
Lyttelton OC, Karama S, Ad-Dab'bagh Y, et al. Positional and surface area asymmetry of the human cerebral cortex[J]. Neuroimage, 2009, 46(4): 895-903.DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.063.
[5]
Wagstyl K, Ronan L, Goodyer IM, et al. Cortical thickness gradients in structural hierarchies[J]. NeuroImage, 2015, 111: 241-250. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.036.
[6]
Chiarello C, Vazquez D, Felton A, et al. Structural asymmetry of the human cerebral cortex: regional and between-subject variability of surface area, cortical thickness, and local gyrification[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2016, 93(Pt B): 365-379.DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.012
[7]
Wiegand LC, Warfield SK, Levitt JJ, et al. Prefrontal cortical thickness in first-episode psychosis: a magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2004, 55(2): 131-140. DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2003.07.009.
[8]
Narr KL, Bilder RM, Toga AW, et al. Mapping cortical thickness and gray matter concentration in first episode schizophrenia[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2005, 15(6): 708-719. DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhh172.
[9]
Wallace GL, Robustelli B, Dankner N, et al. Increased gyrification, but comparable surface area in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders[J]. Brain, 2013, 136(Pt 6): 1956-1967. DOI:10.1093/brain/awt106.
[10]
Abé C, Ekman CJ, Sellgren C, et al. Cortical thickness, volume and surface area in patients with bipolar disorder types I and Ⅱ[J]. J Psychiatry Neurosci, 2016, 41(4): 240-250.DOI:10.1503/jpn.150093.
[11]
van Velzen LS, Schmaal L, Milaneschi Y, et al. Immunometabolic dysregulation is associated with reduced cortical thickness of the anterior cingulate cortex[J]. Brain Behav Immun, 2017, 60: 361-368. DOI:10.1016/j.bbi.2016.10.019.
[12]
Khundrakpam BS, Lewis JD, ostopoulos PK, et al. Cortical thickness abnormalities in autism spectrum disorders through late childhood, adolescence, and adulthood: a large-scale MRI study[J]. Cerebral Cortex, 2017, 27(3): 1721-1731. DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhx038.
Hamilton LS, Narr KL, Luders E, et al. Asymmetries of cortical thickness:effects of handedness, sex, and schizophrenia[J]. Neuroreport, 2007, 18(14): 1427-1431. DOI:10.1097/WNR.0b013e3282e9a5a2
[15]
Vingerhoets G, Li X, Hou L, et al. Brain structural and functional asymmetry in human situs inversus totalis[J]. Brain Struct Funct, 2018, 223(4): 1937-1952. DOI:10.1007/s00429-017-1598-5.
Im K, Lee JM, Lee J, et al. Gender difference analysis of cortical thickness in healthy young adults with surface-based methods[J]. Neuroimage, 2006, 31(1): 31-38. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.042.
[18]
Luders E, Narr KL, Thompson PM, et al. Hemispheric asymmetries in cortical thickness[J]. Cereb Cortex, 2006, 16(8): 1232-1238. DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhj064.
[19]
Koelkebeck K, Miyata J, Kubota M, et al. The contribution of cortical thickness and surface area to gray matter asymmetries in the healthy brain[J]. Hum Brain Mapp, 2014, 35(12), 6011-6022. DOI:10.1002/hbm.22601.
[20]
Zhou D, Lebel C, Evans A, et al. Cortical thickness asymmetry from childhood to older adulthood[J]. NeuroImage, 2013, 83: 66-74. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.073.
[21]
Plessen KJ, Hugdahl K, Bansal R, et al. Sex, age, and cognitive correlates of asymmetries in thickness of the cortical mantle across the life span[J]. J Neurosci, 2014, 34(18): 6294-6302. DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3692-13.2014.
Chiarello C, Vazquez D, Felton A, et al. Structural asymmetry of the human cerebral cortex: regional and between-subject variability of surface area, cortical thickness, and local gyrification[J]. Neuropsychologia, 2016, 93(Pt B): 365-379. DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.012.
2019, Vol. 24 
