Abstract：Objective To sum up the anatomic features of lumbar intervertebral space and classify of X-ray images, to provide the guidance for the clinical application of theforepart-expansible cage.Methods One hundred and thirty cases of lumbar instability treated with micro-endoscopic discectomy (MED) and posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the forepart-expansible cage and combined with percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation from January 2013 to January 2015 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University were retrospective analyzed. There were 69 males and 61 females, with an average age of 49 years (15-76 years). There were 209 segmental lesions: L1/2 8 lesions, L2/3 9 lesions, L3/4 34 lesions, L4/5 90 lesions, and L5/S1 68 lesions. The following indicators of each segmental lesion were measured in lumbar lateral X-ray images: the anterior intervertebral heights (a), anterior Disc Pit heights (b), and posterior intervertebral heights (c). According to the ratio of a/b and c/b, the intervertebral space can be classified into six types: AD(a/b>1 and c/b>0.5), AE (a/b>1 and c/b≤0.5), BD (a/b=1 and c/b>0.5), BE (a/b=1 and c/b≤0.5), CD (a/b<1 and c/b>0.5), and CE (a/b<1 and c/b≤0.5). Postoperative X-ray was performed to confirm cage position change, postoperative CT was performed to confirm fusion. According to the Japan Department of Orthopedics (JOA), the effect of surgery was evaluated.Results There were 209 segmental lesions in 130 cases of lumbar instability. All the patients treated with MED and posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the forepart-expansible cage,there were 9 cases with gradeⅠ (7 cases) and grade Ⅱ(2 cases) lumbarspondylolisthesis combined with percutaneous pedicle screw internal fixation.The ratio of AD, AE, BD, BE, CD accounted for 78.0%(163/209), 10.5%(163/209), 8.6%(22/209), 2.4%(18/209), 0.5%(51/209). The patients were followed-up for 3-24 months. According to the JOA, improvement rate was 86.4%. According to the classification standard, 91 patients were cured, 31 patients had marked effect, 8 patients were effective. According to Suk criterion, solid union occurred in 86 cases (41.1%, 86/209) and probable union in 123 cases (58.9%, 123/209). Subsidence of two cages was found in one case of AD type, and one cage was found in one case of BD type. The total subsidence rate was 0.7%(3/418). Displacement of one cage was found in one case of CD type. The total displacement rate was 0.2%(1/418). None nerve injury or death case was found.Conclusions X-ray anatomic classification of lumbar intervertebral space can provide the guidance for choosing the placement and estimating the displacement trend of the forepart-expansible cage with micro endoscopic discectomy and posterior lumbar interbody fusion, reduce or avoid the cage move, and improve effect of surgical treatment.
张春霖, 王若愚, 李莹, 王闯建, 严旭. 腰椎失稳症患者腰椎间隙X线解剖分型及其临床意义[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2015, 20(6): 488-493.
Zhang Chunlin, Wang Ruoyu, Li Ying, Wang Chuangjian, Yan Xu.. The X-ray anatomic classification of lumbar vertebrain with lumbar intervertebral space and its clinical significance. Chinese Journal of Anatomy and Clinics, 2015, 20(6): 488-493.
Chang TS, Chang JH, Wang CS, et al. Evaluation of unilateral cage-instrumented fixation for lumbar spine[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2010, 5: 86.
[8]
Sudo H, Oda I, Abumi K, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of five different lumbar Reconstruction techniques on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and lamina strain[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2006, 5(2): 150-155.
[9]
Villavicencio AT, Burneikiene S, Bulsara KR, et al. Perioperative complications in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior Reconstruction for lumbar disc degeneration and instability[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2006, 19(2): 92-97.
Aoki Y, Yamagata M, Nakajima F, et al. Examining risk factors for posterior migration of fusion cages following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a possible limitation of unilateral pedicle screw fixation[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2010, 13(3): 381-387.
[12]
Gepstein R, Werner D, Shabat S, et al. Percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion using the B-twin expandable spinal spacer[J]. Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2005, 48(6): 330-333.
Suk SI, Lee CK, Kim WJ, et al. Adding posterior lumbar interbody fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 1997, 22(2): 210-219.
[17]
Grant JP, Oxland TR, Dvorak MF. Mapping the structural properties of the lumbosacral vertebral endplates[J]. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26(8): 889-896.
2015, Vol. 20 
